Disclaimer: For entertainment purposes only! What the hell do I know anyway?! I'm a clown who raps.
By JM Talboo DebunkerBusters.blogspot.com
Missing/Killed UAP Scientists/Military Info Omits Pattern of Harassment/Murder of Citizens, Researchers & Activists---Exposing Hidden Spider In Web Named Democide---Debunking Arguments Demolished Like a DEW Attack!
Please don't let this content upset you. There is more good in the world than bad. Please share this page, but also check out the positive efforts to make the world a better place I've featured at the bottom of the page and make some of your own too. 😁
I was inspired to put this archive of info together due to the reporting I've seen about these recently missing scientists and omitting the facts highly indicating that it isn't just high level individuals that are being harassed and possibly murdered, but also people you might not expect. But what can be 100 percent proven, you ask?
For starters, the UFO foundation the claims of missing and dead scientists in relation to UFOs is built upon is a sturdy foundation, as opposed to a one of sand. Which we were once widely led to believe was the case by the status quo/establishment defender types out there.
The UFO/non-human topic has been testified to as reality by an American intelligence officer via official approval during congressional testimony while under oath while he revealed verified government crash retival programs.
AI Overview
This is further supported by reporting first broke uncharacteristically by the NY Times about hard evidence captured by military fighter jets and ground radar systems that government cannot explain as being anything conventional, but is readily explained by the other newer evidence it now supports.
Now FOX News is reporting in all seriousness on TV about Grusch's most recent claims that people within the retrieval program came upon an unexpected scene where there were witnesses to an apparent aftermath of a fight between classic gray beings that were decreased and reptilian humanoids that then killed a human, after which military personnel ended up killing some of the reptilians.
See the news report video yourself...
Some people can take never a win and see everything as deception. Sorry, I've researched this material for too long to doubt my self now. Funny how Grusch made his recent revelation on Joe Rogan's show. Oh, how far we've come since I posted this over 11 years ago.
Undebunking UFOs: Debunking Joe Rogan on Alien Abduction
https://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2015/07/debunking-joe-rogan-on-alien-abduction.htmlFirst off, it is completely beyond doubt that this case includes evidentiary points that at one time not so long ago. didn't exist. These new developments prove that those who dismissed these topics were defending official narratives that are now more in line with the so-called conspiracy nuts of the world. Maybe the "white hats" have taken some control?
It's almost like this info from Gemini AI is correct or something and people started to notice.
"Individuals with psychopathic traits do frequently gravitate toward positions of power, including roles in political leadership, government, and corporate hierarchies. Psychological research and political theory frequently discuss this phenomenon under terms like pathocracy—a system where a small minority of individuals with personality disorders control the majority."
Hence, hand waving enused by many casual observers making a priori assumptions, who had their conclusions of "Kookery" bolsteted by the status quo in almost every way.
From official denials to lack of mainstream coverage, to debunker proclamations of victory, to pop culture mockery. They saw to it that anything that might suggest these institutions were dead wrong was dead on arrival to deaf ears, blind eyes, and unprying hands. Now, some of what was once used to dismiss things has reversed.
Official denials became congressional testimony paired with hard evidence in the form of officially sanctioned videos and military radar data.
Debunkers had to go from declaring victory over one type opponent to fighting a whole gang of new ones.
Let's compare and contrast.
The initial foe.
Debunkers vs The UFO Menace - Jerome Clark or, Is Ufology Tantamount to Communism? by Jerome Clark (written in 1992)
Well, damn. The praise in those in those days, was how shall we say, a bit less.
The UFOlogist
Volunteer, non expert pedigree, only trained by others like them.
Culturally mocked thus unpopular. Maginalized civilians, with no official backing.
Has no hard evidence his critics couldn't successfully characterize as soft with softball questions from mainstream media.
With no whistle blowers allies that couldn't be dismissed as financially motivated or seeking attention. Afterall, they were getting no positive attention from anyone in government or media.
The New Opponent AKA the Boot Still Covered In Their Spit.
Went from defending their denials to insulting their skills with smiles.
How Can Highly Trained Military Pilots Possibly Misinterpret Things They See?
Who needs to debate conspiracy theorists with friends like this! 😂
He debated me anyway. It seemingly didn't go well for him...
Reviews of my interview, JM Talboo, with Mick West--- Pay close attention kiddos, I trick Mick into admitting conspiracies conducted by powerful people is the norm and not an aberration!
https://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2023/09/reviews-of-my-interview-jm-talboo-with.htmlI proposed a UFO debate. He declined as he was supposedly busy. He didn't debate the people here either...
Debunking Metabunk's Mick West On NAVY UFO Sightings
https://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2019/11/debunking-metabunks-mick-west-on-navy.htmlDebunking the Debunkers: Debunking Mick West on Hulsey WTC 7 Report - NIST vs. Reality vs. Hulsey
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/debunking-mick-west-on-hulsey-wtc-7.htmlBut I Digress...
The New Opponent AKA the Old Boss
Military expert fighter pilots trained on what's potentially odd in the sky and trained observerers in general.
Culturally thanked for their service.
Popular. Shown gratitude even when war in unpopular.
Top Gun turned top opp!
Because the new breed doesn't have taped up lips.
Intelligence officer whistleblower being allowed to testify before congress revealing the existence of few lil things under oath...
While sworn in he was fielding the hardest of questions unlike the debunker's old lap dogs who used kid gloves.
Once propped up by media outlets while acting as the debunker's passive snickering friend, now they have turned to an active foe.
They no are longer in any way guaranteed to lend credibility, support, and/or ammunition, but rather now often favor the cold shoulder to the dogmatic naysayers.
The original ufolo-foes are now allies helping the lamestream become part of the team and be journalists again teaching them slowly to do formerly strictly Ufologist type research.
Debunker Busters: Debunking UFO Debunkers
https://debunkerbusters.blogspot.com/2016/03/debunking-ufo-debunkers.htmlThe subject at the heart of all the claims about the missing and dead scientists and military brass isn't debunked, mocked, or fringe anymore in the way it used to be in the least.
That is proven IMHO and documents are being released as well, but rarely covered in the slightly less gut-wreatching vomitstream media. They are doing better, but sensationalism often obscures real research that requires reading!
TTR Episode 28: JM Talboo & Larry Pinkney Talk Black Panthers, Racism, Trump, Vomitstream Media, Censorship, Being Conspiracy Analysts NOT Theorists, 9/11 Truth, UFOs and More!
https://truthtellersradio.blogspot.com/2019/07/ttr-episode-28-jm-talboo-larry-pinkney.html"The Pentagon recently dropped a whole library of UAP research papers!
Put together, they compile a comprehensive blueprint for UFO technology! Alien craft do not break the laws of physics! They master them!"
Watch "Pentagon reveals UAP BLUEPRINT that explains everything!" on YouTube
Now we will also unquestionably prove all of the same points regarding directed energy weapons AKA DEWs and them being used against civilians that were just proved about the UFO topic.
Note, I didn't say all my conclusions are correct or that all my dots paint the picture I think they do. But if they don't it sure would be odd that my conspiricist ilk keeps proving ourselves ahead of the curve, but the goalposts for our earned respect seems to always move and it's a well-known logical fallacy, a form of flawed argumentation, that these pseudo-skeptics purportedly hate in principal, but yet love to use when it fits their needs... Principles for thee not me. It's nothing new.
Debunking the Debunkers: The "Pseudosceptics"
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2012/07/blog-post.htmlDebunking the Debunkers: 1,000 Architectural and Engineering Professionals Chasing a Moving Goalpost
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/01/1000-architectural-and-engineering.html
First, it's note worthy that one of the missing UFO scientists is mentioned the very beginning of the presentation below, which we'll revisit later in this infowar munitions cache.
Watch "Missing Scientists, UFO Files and The 2027 Warning" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/1NcocRvrvSE?is=z2XpZPiqrovDzIaY "U.S. propulsion researcher Amy Eskridge claimed she was targeted and hit by a directed energy weapon inside her Alabama home before she died by suicide on June 11, 2022."
DEWs used to be treated as nearly science fiction even as recently as 2022, as did claims about them being used on people, much less US civilians. But official coverups and pretty much everything else has switched up much like how I just demonstrated with UFOs and aliens. The tables have turned in the conspiracy theorist's favor.
Regarding DEWs, in 2022, we were still hearing from the mainstream that "they still exist at the periphery of both theoretical and practical battlefield application."
While claims from researchers about energy weapons being used on civilians go back to 1995! Just wait until after that when you see what mainstream news is reporting on now. It's all going to feel very familiar.
DIRECTED-ENERGY WEAPONS: FROM THE FRINGE TO MAINSTREAM INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING
The Havana syndrome controversy is another important piece of this puzzle. For years, American diplomats, intelligence officers, and other government personnel have reported unusual neurological symptoms and other health problems that some believe may have resulted from exposure to directed-energy weapons or other novel technologies.
Let's establish something right up front: these reports are not simply coming from stereotypical internet conspiracy theorists wearing tinfoil hats. Some of the people reporting these experiences were members of the U.S. government's own diplomatic and intelligence apparatus. Furthermore, the possibility of foreign adversaries using novel weapons against at least some of these individuals has been taken seriously by journalists, researchers, and elected officials with intelligence oversight responsibilities.
In 2020, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine published an assessment that identified pulsed radio-frequency energy as the most plausible mechanism among those considered for certain distinctive symptoms reported by some personnel. That finding did not establish that a weapon caused every case, but it demonstrated that the possibility was being examined by a respected scientific institution rather than dismissed out of hand.
The debate has continued within the government itself. In December 2024, Representative Rick Crawford released an interim report arguing that a foreign adversary was increasingly likely to be responsible for some anomalous health incidents. In January 2025, the intelligence community's updated assessment reached a largely skeptical conclusion about foreign-adversary involvement in most cases, while two components assessed that there was roughly an even chance a foreign actor had used or developed a novel weapon capable of harming a small, undetermined subset of those affected. Members of Congress subsequently challenged aspects of the intelligence community's conclusions and handling of the issue.
Meanwhile, investigative journalists have continued examining the allegations. CBS's 60 Minutes investigated the possibility of an invisible weapon targeting American diplomats, and journalist Catherine Herridge published reporting challenging the prevailing official assessment. The existence of disagreement does not establish that every allegation is true. It does establish that the subject has attracted serious investigative attention and debate among people working within, reporting on, and overseeing the institutions involved.
And here's a historical reminder for anyone tempted to assume that official skepticism automatically settles a question: Agent Orange.
The toxic effects of Agent Orange and its association with serious illnesses became the subject of years of controversy, scientific investigation, disputes over responsibility, and battles for recognition and compensation. The fact that authorities disputed, minimized, or failed to fully acknowledge harms at particular points in time did not mean those harms were imaginary. Nor does that history prove that every modern allegation of technological abuse is true. It demonstrates something much simpler: official disagreement is not the same thing as definitive disproof.
Now let's return to the argument that concerns us here.
The claim that directed-energy weapons and alleged technological attacks against human beings are exclusively a fringe subject is debunked by the very existence of this controversy. Government personnel have reported anomalous health incidents. Scientific institutions have investigated possible mechanisms. Mainstream news organizations have reported on the allegations. Members of Congress have challenged official assessments. And competing conclusions have emerged from within the government itself.
Read that again: THE GOVERNMENT IS PART OF THE STORY FROM THE BEGINNING.
These are not merely claims circulating in obscure corners of the internet. They concern allegations involving government employees, intelligence agencies, scientific assessments, congressional investigations, and mainstream investigative journalism. The government is not a single person speaking with one unquestionable voice, and disagreement within its institutions is itself part of the documented record.
Does all this prove that every reported incident was a directed-energy attack? No. Does it prove that every person who believes they have been targeted is correct? No. Neither conclusion is necessary to establish the point being made here.
The blanket characterization of this entire subject as fringe has been debunked. Period.
And to the debunkers who continue treating the mere discussion of these possibilities as proof of irrationality: when government personnel are reporting these experiences, members of Congress are questioning official conclusions, and mainstream journalists are investigating the allegations, perhaps it's time to retire the tinfoil-hat routine.
You can dispute a particular allegation. You can challenge a source. You can argue that an explanation has not been established by the available evidence. Those are legitimate parts of an investigation.
But declaring an entire subject fringe does not debunk the subject. It avoids engaging with the evidence.
So, congratulations to the debunkers: in their rush to debunk the possibility that this subject deserves serious consideration, they have managed to debunk their own blanket characterization of it as fringe.
THE DEBUNKERS ARE DEBUNKED ON THAT POINT.
The questions surrounding directed-energy weapons, anomalous health incidents, and potential technological abuse remain contested. But whether this is a subject that has entered mainstream investigative and governmental discussion is no longer a serious question.
IT HAS.
And that is precisely why the allegations involving ordinary citizens, independent researchers, activists, and other people outside the government deserve to be examined on their individual evidence rather than automatically dismissed through a stereotype.
GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS CHALLENGE THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT OF HAVANA SYNDROME
The debate over alleged directed-energy attacks is not confined to independent journalists, researchers, or people who identify as targeted individuals. Members of the U.S. Congress have also publicly challenged intelligence assessments that largely rejected foreign-adversary involvement in Havana syndrome cases.
On December 5, 2024, Representative Rick Crawford, then chairman of the House Intelligence Committee's CIA Subcommittee, released an interim report arguing that a foreign adversary was increasingly likely to be responsible for some reported anomalous health incidents. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner explicitly endorsed that conclusion, stating that he agreed foreign adversaries were likely responsible for some cases.
In January 2025, Turner and Crawford again challenged the intelligence community's assessment, arguing that the conclusions failed to adequately account for evidence concerning possible foreign involvement. Their statements demonstrate that the interpretation of these incidents has been disputed within the U.S. government itself.
In January 2026, Representative Andrew Garbarino and other members of the House Homeland Security Committee sought answers about reports that the U.S. government had acquired a device potentially connected to Havana syndrome. Their inquiry addressed the device's acquisition, testing, and possible relevance to the investigation.
These developments are important because they establish that concerns about possible directed-energy attacks have reached congressional investigations and official government debate. They also demonstrate that government officials have disagreed over whether the reported injuries could have resulted from a weapon.
The existence of these disagreements does not establish the cause of every reported incident. However, the subject cannot accurately be described as one discussed exclusively by fringe commentators when members of Congress are publicly investigating the allegations, challenging intelligence assessments, and demanding further answers.
SOURCES:
House Intelligence Committee, December 5, 2024:
House Intelligence Committee, January 10, 2025:
House Homeland Security Committee, January 15, 2026:
https://homeland.house.gov/2026/01/15/homeland-republicans-investigate-reports-of-havana-syndrome-device-acquired-by-dhs-under-the-biden-administration/
Are directed energy weapons being used on civilian populations to manipulate people’s thoughts and behaviour? - The Expose
https://expose-news.com/2024/09/19/are-directed-energy-weapons-being-used/ Excerpt:
In the year 2000, the Scientific and Technological Options Assessment (“STOA”) panel of the European Parliament published a study entitled ‘Crowd Control Technologies’ which wrote:
In October 1999 NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in allied arsenals… The most controversial non-lethal crowd control and anti-materiel technology proposed by the US are so-called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behaviour in a variety of unusual ways… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system… The research undertaken to date both in the US and in Russia can be divided into two related areas: (i) individual mind control and (ii) crowd control.
Crowd Control Technologies (An appraisal of technologies for political control) Final Study, Working document for the STOA Panel, June 2000, pg. liii
Directed energy system was further defined in the technical annexe as a “directed energy weapon system designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at the synapse level,” with the note: “Highly classified programme and hard data is difficult to access” (pg. 67).
In the 1990s, the USA were constructing the radar system HAARP, which according to the book by Nick Begich and Jeanne Maning ‘Angels Don’t Play This HAARP’, can be used to control the activity of human brains in large areas of the planet.
After the publication of the book, the European Parliament held a special hearing, where the co-author of the book Nick Begich was testifying. As a result of his testimony the European Parliament adopted a resolution, where it called “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings” (paragraph 30). Against possible expectations, the European media did not publish and explain this call. The evident reason was that weapon systems “designed to match radio frequency source to interfere with human brain activity at synapse level” were “highly classified” or in other words qualified as information related to national defence.
End excerpt.
2026...
Watch "Directed Energy Weapons & Targeted Individuals (News Nation)" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/hnoQAwCfBVQ?is=OKjWu_cmvtXLKgwZ 
"The event appears to be the first publicly known instance of a Pentagon chief personally watching such weapons being fired, Laser Wars reported."
Pair this with Emmy Award winning investigative journalist and former CBS News correspondent, Catherine Herridge, being featured on TV news claiming without push back that her gathering and examination of evidence indicates, despite status quo claims to the contrary, that civilians are being targeted domestically.
This presentation features Herridge as being important, but also involved for whatever reason in what is called in activist circled a "limited hangout." Essentially she only is giving half the story.
Watch "Directed Energy Weapons & Targeted Individuals (News Nation)" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/hnoQAwCfBVQ?is=lib4jW8WE-yiK8nI The video features a talk by this wacko... 🤣
"Dr. James Giordano, he is a prominent American neuroscientist, neuroethicist, and national security expert. He currently serves as a director and fellow focusing on disruptive technology and future warfare. His work prominently examines the concept of a "neurobioeconomy" and the ethical and tactical implications of neurotechnology in modern global conflict."
To make it simple, he asserts with his expertise and documentation that, in no uncertain terms, these type of weapons can be designed to not just physically attack people, but literally interfere with the brain in such a way as to attempt to control someone's thoughts and more...
Video: Bigger than Snowden. Neuro Weapons. Directed Energy Weapons. Mind Control. Targeted Individuals. - Global Research
https://www.globalresearch.ca/video-bigger-than-snowden-neuro-weapons-directed-energy-weapons-mind-control-targeted-individuals/5749926 "I can disrupt an individual from the level of their system and disrupt individuals on a variety of levels, from individuals all the way up to the social fabric. Target a specific individual, change or eliminate that individual with very little attribution or trace, …” – Dr. James Giordano, DARPA Neurologist/Weapons Expert, Presentation at the Modern War Institute
Finally, further pair that with older conspiracy research and whistleblowers and you've got a lot more proof that conspiracy theorists were ahead of their time on the related topics of DEWs and Targeted Individuals, yet again, as demonstrated above with UFOs/aliens.
It's also self evident that the reported numbers of these abuses are either extremely widespread, or at minimum a major factor in people who have become aware of the issue suffering paranoid delusions that they too are being targeted. Thousands of professionally documented alleged victims are discussed in the presentation below, who are noted to be highly educated in significant amount.
Conspiracy Theory With Jesse Ventura 2012 (S03E07 Brain Invaders)
https://ok.ru/video/1962022472344 "Ventura interviews a group of so-called "targeted individuals" (or "TIs") – people who claim that they are being manipulated and tortured by mind-control signals after they have spoken out against the government. He further looks into the technology that could be behind these attacks, such as microwave transmitting GWEN towers, and meets with insiders who claim to have worked on and and developed the technology for the government that began with Project MKUltra."
Watch "Targeted Individuals Dr Robert Duncan and Jesse Ventura" on YouTube
https://youtube.com/shorts/ZR54fKfbQ3M?is=kdO7sQNyldzIzCUY Duncan is presented as a "mind control expert." He stated that "he's impowered the dark side" with his "work on projects for the CIA, Justice Department, and Defense of Defenseand." He says "the government is using voice of God weapons" responsible for reports of "voices in the head" by targeted individuals and unequivocally says "the government is doing this to them."
A version of this technology is demonstrated to be real to Ventura by Dr. Nick Begich during his report. Music is beamed into his brain via electrodes on the neck totally bypassing the ears.
Jesse Ventura tests V2K (voice to skull) on himself
https://www.bitchute.com/video/eR26N01KwJHJ/ "With #V2K, the physical electrodes are replaced with powerful directed remote microwaves that penetrate the skin and hit the same target region - the head/skull. Once weaponized with the appropriate equipment - these energy waves (microwaves) can travel relatively long distances and even pass through walls."
"Could the so-called crazies in the tin-foil hats be on to something? Targeted individuals, or TIs, claim that the government is harassing - even torturing - them by sending microwave signals into their brains and bodies to drive them to despair. It's not an isolated case, but thousands of people across the country experiencing the exact same symptoms, all of which began after speaking out against the powers that be. Jesse knows that they aren't nuts - but could it be too late to stop these "voice of God" weapons from turning the population into mindless zombies?"
Now ask yourself, what else are conspiracy researchers right about?
Because duh-bunk-turds don't see the scoreboard for what it is, but the zeitgeist knows.
And that brings us right back to the debunkers' M.O.: dismiss the people raising the questions by labeling them fringe, then act as though labeling the people has debunked the evidence. But when the subject involves government personnel, congressional disagreements, scientific assessments, and mainstream investigative reporting, that routine falls apart. And when the same blanket dismissal is applied to ordinary citizens, independent researchers, and activists, the question becomes why their allegations should be dismissed by stereotype rather than examined on their individual merits.
YOU CANNOT DEBUNK A CLAIM SIMPLY BY DECLARING THE PERSON MAKING IT FRINGE. THAT ISN'T DEBUNKING. IT'S DISMISSAL DRESSED UP AS INVESTIGATION.
The merits of the individual pieces of evidence pointed to from here on out are largely not examined by individual merit, but metaphorically speaking collectively akin to the strands of a spider web.
Each strand being, but a piece of bigger picture of a web that remains if knocked down. The voluminous nature of said strands proves the spider web exists unless enough are knocked down that it falls and can no longer be seen from loss of integrity.
The UFO material is now just part of the web, which when viewed in this way is a more overencompassing concept not dependent on that original material.
The web is representative of the seemingly simple idea that government elements sometime harasses and murder people unjustly, especially when they stick their noses in the wrong places too deeply. The UFO material just brought this well supported web back into too narrow of a scope, either truly or falsely and intentionally or unintentionally, hiding the spider in the web named... Democide!
Watch "DEMOCIDE- THE #1 CAUSE OF DEATH WORLDWIDE" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/rwXmzqNkjo0?is=oSDbNbQGjciEfFU9 "Democide, or populicide, is "the intentional killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity and pursuant to government policy or high command."
Of course it stands to reason that those willing to kill you will easily be willing to mock and harass you first. History shows that this is usually where it starts before it gets progressively worse.
Watch "Missing Scientists, UFO Files and The 2027 Warning" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/1NcocRvrvSE?is=z2XpZPiqrovDzIaY The end of the video gets into UFO researcher, David Wilcock, and lingering questions about the official evidence or lack thereof. As well as debated about whether he actually ended his own life, was murdered, or somehow driven to di so against his will via technology akin to those discussed here.
Much of the harrasement David endured is documented in the film featured here...
Undebunking UFOs: BEYOND DISCLOSURE: THE COREY GOODE FILES Corey Goode: Breadcrumbs, Not Proof — What the Skeptics Get Right, What They May Be Missing, and Why I'm Still Not Ready to Dismiss Him
https://undebunkingufos.blogspot.com/2026/10/beyond-disclosure-corey-goode-files.html
Watch "Why Are Government Employees Dying Like This" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/AmK17fDfwoM?is=RGw1EmIfT-77b__w Regarding the Seth Rich material in the video being characterized as just baseless allegations even though no other explanation is apparent. There is in fact hard evidence that supports the circumstantial evidence you brought up, which has convicted people in court alone.
William "Bill" Edward Binney (born September 1943) is a former National Security Agency (NSA) technical director turned whistleblower.
Bill Binney States that the NSA Has 32 Pages of Communications Between Seth Rich and Julian Assange
BOMBSHELL: NSA Experts Say DNC 'Hack' Was Actually a Leak and Inside Job
"Experts' findings, concludes that the so-called "hack" was actually an inside job by someone with internal access to the DNC's computer network. In other words, the DNC has (or had) a leak"
A few screenshots proving the premise in the headline of this article...
In gathering these screenshots, material I had previously posted material I posted inadvertently showed up in one of them. Well, damn!
That being said, I want it known that I've done my fair share of activism, and I've experienced things akin to those described by some of the individuals whose accounts are detailed at the links accompanying these screenshots.
A few striking examples come to mind.
I've witnessed UFOs on several occasions, always with witnesses.
I've been involved in the effort to have chemical engineer Mark Basile conduct further testing on materials he believed he'd found in World Trade Center dust that indicated the possible use of explosives. At one point, I actually had vials of World Trade Center dust sent to me by Basile.
I subsequently sent those samples to another researcher who claimed that the researchers investigating nanothermite were disinformation agents. This individual argued that conventional explosives, rather than nanothermite, were responsible.
While people on the nanothermite side were accusing this researcher of being a disinformation agent, he was making similar accusations against them. I was trying to help both sides because I wanted the truth, not a predetermined conclusion.
The samples were sent with the understanding that testing would be conducted and that the materials would be returned to me. No testing was ever completed, and eventually, the provenance of the samples was called into question, despite the extensive information that had been provided about their origins.
Yes, it's possible that the samples could have been contaminated or that their contents might not have been what they were represented to be. That's precisely why testing would have been useful. The chemical composition of World Trade Center dust has been extensively studied, and appropriate testing could have helped determine what the samples contained.
But no tests were performed.
That alone was troubling enough. What made the situation more concerning to me was that, despite repeated requests, the samples were never returned. I made multiple pleas for their return, including public requests in which I provided my address so the materials could be sent back to me.
I still have questions about what happened to those samples and why they were never returned.
Another experience involved an individual who presented himself as a fellow 9/11 activist. During a dinner meeting, he repeatedly fumbled with a bag containing something that looked to both my wife and me like it might have been a recording device. He also repeatedly tried to get me to agree that violence was the answer to the 9/11 issue. I refused, because I don't believe violence is the answer. He said he would stay in contact but never did. I found the experience suspicious.
My friend Janice Matthews, associated with 911Truth.org, also experienced some strange incidents. On one occasion, an apparent repairman showed up at her house and was working at her electrical box despite there being no scheduled work. When she questioned what he was doing, he said he would get the paperwork, got into his car, and drove away. These are the circumstances as they were described to me, and I found them concerning.
On the subject of public ridicule, I was a steering committee member of 911Truth.org. It's entirely possible that when South Park mocked 9/11 truth activism, they were mocking an organization of which I was a member, and perhaps people like me.
These are only a few examples. I've had other experiences that I won't detail here.
So let it be known, for whatever it's worth. It doesn't seem to accomplish much these days, but I believe it's worth making the effort.
I am not suicidal. I will never kill myself, and I will never kill anyone else. If you ever hear a story claiming otherwise, don't automatically believe it. Look at the evidence and ask questions.
Have a good day, y'all. Don't live in fear. We're all going to die one day anyway, so try to be joyful, be happy, and make others joyful and happy while we're here.
Don't live in fear. Live your life. Seek the truth. And treat one another with humanity.
Debunking the Debunkers: Strengthening the Power Grid: How Citizens Can Advocate for a More Resilient Infrastructure
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2024/08/strengthening-power-grid-how-citizens.htmlZeitgeist: Moving Forward
This documentary examines the state of the global socioeconomic monetary paradigm, concluding that we need to move to a new resource-based economy.
