Transcript of Tesla & The Cabbage Patch Kids | Tartaria & The Reset of 1776 | The Book

Transcript of Tesla & The Cabbage Patch Kids | Tartaria & The Reset of 1776 | The Book

I grew up in a house with a father that was a little ahead of his time with regard to conspiracy theories I didn't understand why he read books by David Ike who at the time was considered to be out there having been shunned by the BBC and ridiculed by many the thought of someone I considered to be intelligent reading Ike's books baffled me I joined the Freemasons at the Grand Lodge of the United Kingdom located in London when I turned 30 my only reason for joining was finding out what my father knew and hopefully a lot more by progressing through the ranks as quickly as possible my aim was to ultimately join a very specific chapter the night's Templar with just two years to go before I became the worshipful master I decided to leave I returned a few years later for a brief spell simply because my youngest son was desperate to join Sam was initiated into the lodge of lus and at the time was the youngest Freemason in the UK it wasn't until the pandemic that I really started to climb down the rabbit hole with a lot of time on my hands and in the knowledge that I wasn't going to be back to work for at least 9 months I discovered and then spent literally days on bitshoot and on YouTube watching Joe Rogan after a bit of digging I discovered there had been a reset in 1776 and I discovered that this was to see the destruction removal from the pages of History the tartarian Empire the more I looked into this reset the more often I would see the names Max sigon and John Levi appear I then started to search offline too and to my surprise found several books on eBay and in secondhand shops that actually mentioned a place called tartaria Fast Forward four years and I'd built a modest library in fact some of the books I have contain maps that shouldn't exist with races of people and flags and religions too I'd never seen before so arm with this information I made some podcasts then started a group on Facebook and quickly learned I wasn't alone in fact thousands of people across the world had been researching the very same thing so to help others understand what's happening right now and to serve as a warning in the hope we can prevent another reset I decided to put pen to paper the more backwards in history we go the more advanced civilizations actually seem to be almost 250 years ago just before the great flood of 1802 there was a great reset this plunged Humanity back into the Stone Age concealing all of the knowledge possessed at the time this knowledge is considered today to be pseudo science or a cultist and is linked to an Empire you might not have heard of the tartarian Empire some researchers and historians propose that the Dark Ages never actually happened and that credit has been given to the Greeks and Romans for many of The Magnificent buildings we see today therefore removing any trace of the tartarian people I highly recommend reading anatol fco's book called the issue with chronology however it is the first of 22 books he wrote on this subject so you might need a lot of free time Isaac Newton also researched the alternative timeline during the last years of his life but his book The chronology of ancient kingdoms amended was discounted by mainstream historians the basis of their work is that there have been Phantom Events dynasties and people often repeated throughout historical narratives they claim that this was done by scalarane gallager Gallagher was a Jesuit and and is responsible for the timeline we know today just think about it for a moment the hundreds of temples and Cathedrals around the world built with perfect Symmetry and aligned to True North often a ry's belt too apparently built by hand and with stone tools added to this many of the building share very similar Styles and construction techniques yet this was done before we had any practical way to share the information and skill set i'm of the opinion that the technology already existed and had done so for a very long time the Empire of tartaria was one of huge technological advancements and placed emphasis on free travel around the world via airships trains and towards the end the introduction of the electric car World War II saw the destruction of some of the world's most incredible buildings and cities such as Dresden considered to be a major tartarian city with huge importance to the tartarian people what happened in this city divies all human logic and was by any measurement and atrocity after the reset of 1776 it would have been a tall order for the parasites to remove every single trace of the tartarian Empire as well as all of their technology my guess is that as the buildings that were missed off The Hit List came into the spotlight strategic bombing was used to destroy them the Napoleonic and Civil Wars also claimed a vast number of incredible buildings too those that remained standing would ultimately be repurposed but before this could happen there was a slight problem with many old buildings we rarely see the date it was actually built instead they use words like established or founded I believe the word established simply means when the parasites took ownership of the building as their own or to put it another way stole them up until the mid 1800s you'll often see a date carved into a building or tomb where the first number usually being the number one appears to be in a different font to the remaining numbers and is often out of alignment this is because prior to then the tartarians put the letter j or I in front of the date of construction representing the year of Lord Jesus Isis or Isa in Islamic countries this meant that the Vatican and the parasites would need to either state that the J or I is the number one or add a digit to the start date to give the impression that the year was a thousand years later than it actually was constructed one interesting place well worth further investigation is the city of man in Utah in October 1852 a speech was delivered by hea C Kimble a leader in the Latter-Day Saints movement Master Freemason and holder of the York right degree during this speech he said those brethren in Iron County and those that are still at Cole Creek pretty much all of them are iron mongers they were the first to go into the iron and coal business and leave their Farms there are somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 acres of land under cultivation in those valleys that you can have the privilege of purchasing or cultivating for the time being until you can make farms for yourselves in the city of man half of the houses are vacant there are houses enough empty there to accommodate 50 or 100 families in Iron County also there are similar advantages to conclude most of what we know about history and the cause of wars and catastrophic events over the last 250 years is wrong from the Napoleonic War to 9/11 everything that has happened has happened for a very specific reason and it's important to understand and maybe even research it yourself to prepare for what is is coming the next great reset the tartarians are known by several names but more commonly as the Tartar and in the northern hemisphere the TARTA arens the regions countries and continents under their control as well as those that shared their technology and way of life also went by several different names the Empire encompassed Russia most of Asia and spanned across the world as far away as the east coast of America the population of the tartarian empire in Russia and Asia was estimated at 8 million alone in fact the Mongolian Empire was originally known as the tartarian Empire and was renamed to hide even further the most powerful Empire that ever existed there are however still plenty of books in circulation that refer to the tartarians and their empire too there's also an exam paper you can find on Google which I've downloaded and read called a comprehensive system of modern geography and history written by Edwin Williams in 1835 this was used throughout universities Across America for many years Tain was one of the most celebrated Kings of TARTA and ruled from 1370 to 1405 during his Reign he conquered Persia turkistan most of Russia and Hindustan he sacked Aleppo Baghdad and Damascus and went on to conquer Syria and Asia Minor the capital of the tartarian empire was Samar land and each region was governed by a car or Prince of its own kind their ethos was heavily focused on spiritual growth healing using frequency and vibration not just the people but animals too as well as the advancement in technology and later Free World Travel they practiced Fang way when constructing the most incredible buildings ensuring they're aligned with lay lines it is thought by some that one particular group of tartarians were what's known as breatharians a being that does not rely on eating food for sustenance rather getting its energy from The Ether in the same way a plant or a tree does this is possibly why we don't see any sewer systems or waste treatment plants in Old World buildings and cities they had a universal language which some state was based upon Arabic and Sanskrit and others state that they spoke cyan Nicholas Sanson wrote about this in the atlas of Asia which was published in 1653 their flag was dominated by Griffin considered by them to have been a real creature as were Centaur unicorns and mermaids the tartarians believed that Griffins mated for life and when one lost its partner would spend the rest of its days in solitude never seeking a new mate this led to claims by the Vatican that the Griffin was a symbol against remarriage their height was substantially greater than ours today thus creating Intrigue and mystery as Giants have always been creatures we have been told that don't exist this can make it an awkward topic to get into but I suspect that this is the desired effect that the narrative hopes for Tales of giants go back to the beginning of time whether it's Gilgamesh the nephin or fables of David and Goliath they appear everywhere tartarian buildings had and those that remain still have the most enormous doors and windows I appreciate that the bigger the window the more light will enter the room but when the window itself is so very high up that the average person today can't look out of it and with regards to the huge entrances why would anybody build a door 20 or 30 ft High it would take a great deal longer and cost a great deal more to construct then consider the huge rooms for a moment ceiling so high that changing a light bulb requires a bit of forward planning and step ladders quite a bit bigger than the ones most homes have today yes those they look grandiose and demand Kudos but how about heating these rooms in the winter the tartarians the importance of the five elements that govern the planet and everything on it but the powers that be removed The Ether from the list of elements during the 1800s to avoid us paying any particular attention to it or researching it further these elements are land water air far and ether by understanding how to harness energy from these elements the tartarians were able to create free electricity as well as manipulate via simatics their work can still be found today in almost every church and Cathedral where you will see identical window apertures and designs as well as the buildings themselves being constructed using sacred geometry as I understand it just being inside one of these magnificent buildings during the tartarian era gave you a great feeling of euphoria and were only ever designed and intended to heal they use the same methods when landscaping large Public Gardens which could also harness the same frequencies which are 432 and 528 Herz the frequencies of all living matter during the last reset this changed to 440 Herz at the hands of John D Rockefeller thus ensuring that the bells windows and organs now produced a low frequency to conjure a sense of disparity instead what a vile man he must have been and of course his descendants still conspire against us today however rockerfeller was not alone in this betrayal his family was still and is united with the roths ch tartarians typically built on geomagnetic lay lines which allowed them to harness toic energy from the ground these current exhibit dial patterns flowing towards the Sun during the day and towards the poles at night toric Energy may be a term you've not encountered before yet tartarian architecture placed huge importance upon it as they understood that it provided a natural electric current that flowed on and beneath the surface of the Earth one of the most most peculiar remnants of the tartarian Empire has to be the star for sadly this may well be the first time you've ever heard them mentioned but once you've seen them you'll be in awe of their beauty and the incredible engineering it took to create them again they can be found all over the world but from the ground they can be quite hard to detect there remains approximately 319 star fors still in existence and they can be found in Europe South America the Middle East Far East and Russia these uniquely designed symmetrical fortresses are almost always located near a source of water and are actually independent ecosystems that just like Cathedrals and churches create a sense of well-being and Euphoria for those that live within the walls they were constructed using sacred geometry in align with constellations and harness energy from The Ether to generate the frequency of 528 Herz which resonates between its walls they also used ethereal vibration of water airships appear to play a huge role in transportation during The tartarian Reign it is my belief that the many old world buildings we see around were actually used to board them many of the towers within Cathedrals and palaces could also have been used for the very same purpose Pinnacles have clearly been removed and replaced with crosses and crucifixes and given the appearance once again of places of worship for those of you that don't know Alexandra Palace it was built a Mir a crystal p Palace in South London it was designed according to Wikipedia in 1875 by John Johnson and Alfred meon yet no drawings or photographs of its construction exist many people actually state that they were told by their ancestors that a palace stood there for a very long time before this however the place we know today officially opened in May 1873 and they claim it was constructed by salvaging the demolished London's World Fair of 1862 according to the narrative the blueprints were drawn up by Owen Jones back in 1859 yet nothing exists to corroborate this when opened within 16 days a fire broke out and most of the building was destroyed it then took a further 2 years to repair and reconstruct it my suspicion is that the first visitors saw and questioned things that looked out of place in fact as it was originally supposed to be a place for education and culture many theorists believe it was close linked to The Great Library of Alexandria in Egypt Alexandre Palace had numerous Egyptian sculptures and artifacts inside it also had a railway station that closed in 1954 due to lack of funding which I find hard to believe as well it had an organ consisting of 12,000 pipes and 46 ranks enabling it to to achieve any frequency as well as fibbr and tremolo why a building other than a place of worship would have such such a device is again a mystery it also had the most incredible stained glass windows which appear to have been Bright Crystal once upon a time but after the fire they were replaced with dull glass its windows are all simatic in design just like any tartarian Center of healing and of course it's sat on a l line there are numerous UNESCO sites that have a history that doesn't seem to make much sense but it's specifically tartarian buildings that interest me the most for one they are far more common place as their architecture can still be found in every town and city today all you need to do is look up and look down the windows of the buildings will usually be far too high to be of any use the rooftops sometimes have the remnants of the equipment needed to harness energy from The Ether and you can't go far without seeing basement windows peeking through the pavement are we really expected to believe that when these structures were built the Architects chose to have a half window buried under the gravel stone or Tong are we also expected to believe that every house or church was designed with steps leading up to the front door making it harder to access for many and even harder to move items in and out I'm sure you've all heard of Nicola Tesla the namesake of Elon musk's Electric Vehicle Manufacturer and Serbian born inventor of alternating current who in 1891 created the Tesla coil however I'm not totally convinced that Nicola Tesla actually existed but instead could have possibly been a person created by the parasites to explain the discovery of what is actually tartarian technology each large structure like Cathedrals palaces and mansions had the Tesla style coils fitted within the roof some had spires and some had copper domes but both achieved the same desired effect the larger buildings with the sole purpose to receive and store energy were denoted by their red and white rows of brick work resembling a modern battery in many ways in fact the pigment in the red bricks can actually store and conduct electricity by triggering a chemical reaction in a similar way to how rust is produced the tartarians were also innovators of travel and connected electricity they harnessed to a network of metal grids under the city roads this enabled them to run trams without the need for overhead cables and didn't have the restriction or danger of tracks masters of the sea they also knew that salt water created electrolysis which conducted an alternating current when harnessed in a similar way to the buildings this generated electromagnetic energy known as magnetrip but could also power the ship too it was clean and in endless supply tartarian technology doesn't stop with free electricity and free travel not by a Longshot they actually also invented dozens of groundbreaking Concepts like Wireless Heating airships moving sidewalks mobile telephones electric scooters electric cars robots and anti-gravity craft to heat a tartarian home was quite simple and the original purpose of the chimney was very little in common than those of today each fireplace had two goblets or poles either side of the opening and a metal back plate made from radium they didn't burn fuel of any type but instead they utilized the free energy transmitted from the rooftop antenna resonators and capacitors to bounce ionized air between the goblets this was then stored in the metal back plate in the winter it generated Heat by creating a vacuum within the chimney and in the summer the metal back plate absorbed the Heat and the vacuum was used to cool the room the chimney was chimney was simply ventilation it seems to me that the world's fairs which popped up in most major cities in the northern hemisphere at around the same time were actually used to exhibit this tartarian technology now made ready for public use the more advanced technology appears to have been kept for military applications though you may be also interested to learn that the battery goes back a very long time too way further than the tartarian Empire the bagad battery or parium battery was an artifact hypothesized to be an ancient version of a battery found in 1938 by a German archaeologist it's estimated to be around 2,000 years old I would also like to bring your attention to the very mysterious object called the vagra it's Hindu for Thunderbolt And this is a legendary and ritualistic Tool symbolizing the properties of a diamond for indestructibility and a thunderbolt for irresistible force in Hinduism it has also been associated with weapons as it is said to be able to harness energy from The Ether which can be emitted in the same way as a laser gun you might be interested to learn that Elon Musk has one placed on his side table having had their country all but destroyed by the comet of 1811 followed by earthquakes fires and floods then the outbreak of Civil War the Moors that survived were then enslaved to whitewash American history the parasites came up with the story that these African-Americans actually arrived as slaves courtesy of the British Empire yes the Moors originated from Africa but not exactly in the way mainstream history has told us the Moors were significant part of the empire of tartaria in fact these people were Noble sophisticated and highly Advanced their architecture and building methods had constructed not just the star fors but every single magnificent building that was left standing including the White House the only way the parasites had to destroy their history and state claim to the Americas was to enslave them changed their names and forced them to speak English by re-educating them those that refused to comply were murdered and their children were grown up knowing nothing about their past instead they were given a new narrative and told that the early white settlers had civilized America and that before they had arrived it was Barren with only tribes of indigenous people inhabiting it so the term whitewashing not only refers to painting over buildings from the old world thus hiding dates and Engravings but also refers to a far worse and sickening method of denying people from the knowledge of their history and the incredible achievements of their ancestors by 1870 there had been over 75 World fairs in as far away as China and Samoa attended by people from all over the world at a time when World Travel was costly and timec consuming not only that but transporting the Innovations on display would have taken a great deal of effort as it was all done by sea they claimed that at the Chicago World exhibition in 1893 over a quarter of the population of America attended but how when did they stay and are we expected to believe that they trekked across the country in a horse and buggy it's my opinion that the world's fairs and expositions were housed in tartarian or more palaces in their grounds aiming to fool people into thinking that the early settlers were capable of constructing such great architecture therefore ultimately these events were Mass brainwashing exercises what were once tartarian palaces and temples were shown off to the world as having been built from scratched by local builders in as little as 6 months then destroyed shortly afterwards until the 1800s the mentally unwell were usually cared for by friends and family but all of a sudden dozens of purpose-built facilities popped up almost overnight the first Asylum opened in England in 1247 to give Refuge to the mentally ill it was called bethleem and was part of the prior of the New Order of Our Lady of Bethlehem located in the city of London today this is better known as bedum in the 1810 paper called the illustration of Madness written by John Haslam an apothecary to bedum and a leading psychiatrist of the early 19th century detailed the case of James Tilly Matthews who had been a patient in the hospital for some 10 years he believed that his mind was under control of the heirloom a terrifying and mysterious machine with gases that were apparently brainwashing politicians and plunging Europe Into Revolution Terror and War you could be committed for a whole host of ridiculous reasons which as well as you never seeing Freedom again also meant that your children would become orphans and ultimately property of the state the reasons are more insane than the people they locked up it would appear that almost anything other than Towing the line and keeping your mouth shut could get you committed for life this along with all the Civil Wars left a lot lot of Orphan children in every English-speaking country in the world as well as across Europe and Russia too at the start of the 1800s and just a few years after the reset of 1776 there were only a few thousand lunatics housed in Britain's asylums but by the end of the century this had increased to over 100,000 by 1904 America had committed over 1,000 people and Germany had founded more than 400 asylums to cope with demand a demand that didn't exist before the reset literally all of the asylums were built with Incredible skill and craftsmanship but why would the state go to such extraordinary lengths to design and build these incredible Greco Roman style Mansions simply to house the very people they wanted to be removed from society the cost involved and time taken to erect marble pillars landscape beautiful gardens and grounds as well as interior design that would rival any stately home Palace would have been immense it's also worth noting that at the very same time the settlers were building and living in quite basic wooden houses had only a horse and buggy as a mode of transport and worked with basic tools the only logical explanation is that these buildings were the remains of the tartarian Empire and everyone in them was a citizen of the old world that simply couldn't or wouldn't comply to the New World Order Our prisons places where the parasites harness energy I'm not just talking about the buildings themselves which share the same esoteric features as other tartarian structures like the asylums but what about the people held inside if we're all energy then this is surely possible two of the most notorious prisons in England are strange ways of wormwood scrubs which opened in 1868 and 1875 respectively and just like the asylums were clearly very well constructed by skilled Stone Masons and Craftsmen the entrance of wormwood scrubs is truly Majestic and as with many tartarian buildings that stored energy it's built using red brick with white detailing which represents a battery once inside the chapel is incredible with the most beautiful artwork painted directly onto Granite walls depicting the apostles as well as the marble and church pipe organ that is a work of art in itself it's an extraordinary length to go to to house criminals it would have cost an incredible amount of money and taken a very long time to design and construct again as with all tartarian buildings the doors are huge with no reason reasonable explanation for this and the windows are too high to see out of it's also worth pointing out that wormwood is the name of a product that is used to kill parasites orphanages didn't really peak in demand or necessity until the end of the 1700s and start of the 1800s when there was an actual boom in homeless children a Widow would almost always lose custody of their child following the death of their husband with so many ridiculous reasons you could be committed for it was an inevitability if you were a widow that your children would end up orphans sooner or later again the orphanages themselves were the most magnificent buildings identical to the asylums and prisons with that Greco Roman style architecture the Odd Fellows took control of the orphans in the heavily populated city of New York in 1853 and cre created their very own educational system the greatest showman in the world PT Barnum was given the task of how to distribute these children across the country barnham then conspired with Charles luring brace to start placing out these children using the railway networks which sent them to the Midwest in what's known as The Orphan Train movement given an identification number similar to a passport children were bought sold and auctioned off into slavery they then went to work on farms inside the Mills mines and his chimney sweeps too ultimately replacing the tartarian and moish adults that had been killed off living in extreme poverty or committed to the newly established asylums between 1854 in 1929 an estimated 250,000 children were transported by train from New York and Philadelphia at the same time Britain was actually exporting children to Canada with numbers estimated to be over 100,000 in addition to this further 150,000 Aboriginal native Canadian children were sent to orphanages and foundling homes too Italy received 425,000 infants from great tartaria between 1852 and 1860 and there are estimates that the children born just in the year 1875 alone 93,000 of them were abandoned by their parents in France however as shocking as these figures are nowhere has such a huge number of Orphan children as Russia the former capital of the tartarian Empire by 1920 this country had approximately 7 million children living on the streets or in abject poverty foundling homes in St Petersburg and Moscow began to receive 10,500 children a year from across the tartarian Empire when you search for the term Cabbage Patch babies online you will often see repop population and cloning too there is a very good reason for this but first of all we're going to go back to the time of the first narrated film ever made in 1896 with Alice guy she was a Pioneer in French film making and born in 1873 she'll be remembered as the first person to make a narrated silent movie and not only that but she produced acted and directed in it too rather disturbingly her debut movie was called The Fairy of the cabbages in this film which I recommend you take a look at online the fairy picks newborn babies from cabbages in the garden then places them on the ground the babies are actually picked up by their limbs and are clearly in distress crying and screaming throughout the entire process this was followed by Midwife to the upper class in 1900 and both can be found on YouTube despite previously having been lost for many years apparently Alice was inspired to make these films after seeing the baby incubators at the world's fairs where Martin Cooney of German Jewish descent and known as the baby doctor had presented the very first incubator to the public at Berlin in 1896 apparently Cooney actually took the children on loan at the British Empire exhibition in 1924 the babies were borrowed from hospitals in Paris and in America they came from hospitals in New York many of the parents of these children were told that they were still born or had died shortly after the birth to make matters worse and even more shocking the babies on view in these incubators were actually for sale during the same period postcards with images of babies sat in cabbage patches as well as them being offer for sale started to appear in Germany then spread across Europe too some postcards also displayed images of babies being fished out of rivers and streams hatching from eggs as well as arriving on trains or by storm York these postcards became extremely popular and are said to have inspired artists like Salvador daring several actually State quite clearly that the babies are for sale which is why they have become known as repopulation postcards at the same time infants were also being delivered by mail and would actually arrive with postage stamps attached to their clothing when researching the subject I found this particularly hard to believe until I looked online and saw that in 1913 this was absolutely the case many theorists on this subject believe that they were cloned and whilst it is well known that this is possible today was it back then I often wonder what scientists that cloned Dolly the sheep in 1996 did next what would you do did they simply pack away their equipment and conclude their research there and then or did they try something else next the industrial Revolution actually took place over a period of 80 years spanning from 1760 until 1840 and the spinning jenny will almost always be the first invention that's mentioned as well as this we saw mining begin on a massive scale and the horror story surrounding the Victorian workhouses which seemed more like slave labor camps in all cases it's the children that appear to be doing the majority of the work I would like to know where the adults are many tartarian researchers refer to to these places as reset labor camps and suggest that this is where children that came from parents of the old world or those that knew enough about the previous previous civilization to be a problem were sent to suffer when you consider that you had a better chance of your horse winning at the Derby than surviving a week working in one of these places without being injured it's not surprising that they looked upon so dimly mining was the most dangerous profession of all with children as young as 8 years old working with naked flames in very confined spaces quite often with highly flammable gases present too in America the orphan trains provided this Workforce and despite many of the children that rode these trains believing they were about to be welcomed into a new and loving home they ended up working on farms and treated as slaves some were even sold from one Farm to another and this all occurred at the same time as colonization my theory from the research I've done over several years is that the Industrial Revolution was a period of time where powerful and wealthy men took it upon themselves to attempt to reverse engineer the technology that remained from the tartarian Empire probably without actually knowing how to use it safely and properly thus resulting in accidents disasters and deaths Nicola Tesla was born during a lightning storm in the town of smidgen in what is now Croatia on the 10th of July 1856 he was the fourth child of Juka and miltin and halfway through her labor the Midwife proclaimed this child will be a child of Darkness to which his mother replied no he will be a Child of Light at just 5 years old he witnessed his brother fall from a horse and subsequently die as a result of the injuries this would haunt him for the rest of his life during his childhood he would often see Visions with flashes of light which would cause confusion enough for him to sometimes not be able to tell the difference between what was real and what was not these Visions enabled Tesla to imagine the most incredible Creations in such specific detail that he never needed to actually document them onto paper he said in Publications like the electrical experimenter invariably my device works as I conceived it should and the experiment comes out exactly as I planned it in 20 years there has not been a single exception he credited his mother for his interest in inventing and juker actually invented small household appliances as a hobby and had an incredible memory which gave her the ability to recall an image from her mind this gift she clearly passed down to her son his father was a priest and had always wanted him to follow in his footsteps but Tesla's only interest was in engineering Tesla had become obsessed with getting rid of the wires needed to transport electricity from one place to another and in 1891 he introduced the Tesla coil to the world using resonance the coil could amplify low voltages into much higher ones and in fact it was able to amplify them into enormous voltages and by emitting very high frequencies the Tesla coil could actually illuminate a light bulb wirelessly Tesla wanted to use this technology to transmit electricity wirelessly to every corner of the world to do this he decided decided that lightning would be the best method of harnessing energy so in 1899 he left New York and relocated his laboratory to kado Springs enabling him to work in secret and away from the prying eyes of Thomas Edison he then set to work in building or in my opinion recreating the antennas we have seen on photographs of the old world tartarian buildings he was Now using energy gathered from The Ether in 1908 most scientists believed that this was actually possible to achieve along with many of the people that have researched the work of this great man myself included but with the financial backing of Morgan now gone Tesla's vision of transmitting wireless energy lay in tatters added to this in 1917 further rumors started to spread about Warden Cliffe being used by German spies resulting in the tower being demolished all of this had a very significant impact on both his mental and physical health now almost bankrupt he became a recluse and spent almost his entire time hidden away in rooms 3327 and 3328 on the 33rd floor of the New Yorker Hotel where he started breeding pigeons in fact he stayed in these rooms for the next 30 Years then as World War II reared its ugly head Tesla announced his creation of the death ray this weapon could send a beam of energy at a speed of 36,000 mph it could be configured to generate a defensive shield around an entire country or continent so all he needed now was a new financial backer Tesla's sale of this technology in 1935 raised him $225,000 and is well documented however most believe that the design he sold the Russians was too basic to W make a working model at the same time he is thought to have been having secret Communications with a German spy named George Floric who was convicted of being a high ranking Nazi officer at the end of the war he then offered the very same information to the US military but 3 days later on the 7th of January 1943 he was found dead in his hotel room and never made the meeting upon his death Tesla's room was almost immediately accessed by several key figures including John G Trump oddly enough Trump and Bliss Fitzgerald went on to research the very same technology for the military along with several other inventions Tesla had been working on Nicola Tesla never married nor did he have any romantic relationships during his 86 years he chose to remain celbrate his entire life and only slept for 3 hours a night he believed in the existence of extraterrestrial life and had a strange fascination with pearls his only flaw appears to be his lack of business but perhaps he just had a little too much faith in human nature one thing is for certain if Nicola Tesla did exist and created these inventions he single-handedly changed the course of history and Life as we know it either that or was the genius we know and love reverse engineering this antiquitech from the tartarian Empire if it is the latter then how did he manage to get hold of it well well I hope you've enjoyed hearing a few paragraphs from some of the chapters of my book if you'd like a sign copy please get in touch you can email me or message me through YouTube or my Facebook group of the same name the book's also available on Amazon thank you

BOMBSHELL: TikTok Admits to Being for Government Control and Against Free Speech 

By JM Talboo 

Something happened recently that reminded me why I've spent so many years writing about censorship and free expression.

I submitted a TikTok advertisement for one of my songs.

It was rejected.

The stated reason was that the advertisement contained prohibited content advocating against government policy processes. The explanation further characterized the material as opposing censorship and government control and therefore falling under restricted political-advocacy rules.

I disagree with that characterization.

The video is artistic expression. It is music. It doesn't endorse a political party, candidate, bill, government program, or specific legislative proposal.

The song is anti-war.

It encourages people to pay attention to corruption.

It expresses the idea that government should remain accountable to the people.

And yes, it criticizes censorship.

But none of that tells anybody which particular government policy they should support or oppose.

I'm nonpartisan.

I'm not asking TikTok to agree with my politics. I'm asking whether an anti-war artistic statement and a general defense of free expression should automatically be classified as prohibited advocacy against a government policy.

That distinction matters.

This Isn't Just About One TikTok Ad

Someone might reasonably ask why I would write an entire article about one rejected advertisement.

Because censorship isn't only about whether one particular post disappears.

It's about how categories are defined.

Political content.

Restricted content.

Sensitive content.

Misinformation.

Harmful content.

Prohibited advocacy.

Those categories can be necessary in some circumstances. Private platforms have legitimate reasons to establish rules governing what they will host or promote.

But the broader those categories become, the more important precision becomes.

If someone says, “I oppose this particular bill,” that's plainly political advocacy.

If someone says, “Vote for this candidate,” that's plainly political advocacy.

If someone says, “Support this government program,” that's plainly political advocacy.

But if someone creates a song saying war is wrong, censorship is dangerous, corruption should be exposed, and government should remain accountable to the people, what specific government policy is being advocated against?

That is the question I believe TikTok's classification raises.

This Has Followed Me Into My Music

For me, this isn't happening only with written articles.

It has followed me into my music.

Before the current channel, I had two separate music channels taken down, and each had approximately 6,000 subscribers.

So when I started building my newest music project, I wasn't exactly naïve about what could happen.

The new project is Crashout Aristocrats, and the current TikTok account is @CrashOut.Royalty.

I've deliberately approached this project as artistic expression rather than political campaigning. The songs cover all kinds of subjects—sometimes serious, sometimes absurd, sometimes philosophical, sometimes intentionally ridiculous.

That's what music is supposed to be.

And yet I've already had content removed.

At one point, I had a video removed over fireworks.

Not a political statement about fireworks. Not instructions for making explosives. Just a video containing fireworks.

I later made a separate video featuring digital fireworks in which I talked about how ridiculous it was that the previous video had been censored. That video isn't the point here; I'm mentioning it only to make clear that these were two different pieces of content.

More recently, another music video was removed without any meaningful explanation of what specifically was supposedly prohibited. I appealed the decision, and the appeal has remained unresolved.

That distinction matters.

An unresolved appeal isn't the same thing as a confirmed violation, and I'm not going to pretend it is.

But from the user's perspective, there's still a serious problem:

What exactly am I supposed to change if nobody will tell me what I did wrong?

That's the larger issue.

I'm not asking a platform to guarantee that every piece of my music will be promoted.

I'm asking for understandable rules and meaningful explanations.

And when an artist repeatedly encounters removals, restrictions, or unexplained moderation decisions, eventually the question becomes bigger than any individual song.

Eventually, I started using a simple static image in some of my music videos that says:

“If you censor this, you're just censoring music.”

That's not a political slogan.

It's a statement about what happens when ordinary artistic expression gets placed into increasingly broad moderation categories.

The First Amendment Doesn't Belong Only to Popular Opinions

There is a reason I take this so seriously.

The American First Amendment tradition is unusually protective of expression—even expression that people find offensive.

In Matal v. Tam, the Supreme Court unanimously struck down a federal trademark provision that discriminated against disparaging expression. The Court emphasized that government cannot prohibit speech simply because it expresses ideas that offend.

SOURCE:
https://townhall.com/news/laurettabrown/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-hate-speech-is-still-free-speech-n2343286

SUPREME COURT OPINION:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1293_1o13.pdf

There is an important caveat.

TikTok is a private company, not the government. The First Amendment generally restricts government action, so Matal v. Tam doesn't mean TikTok is legally required to publish my advertisement.

But that doesn't make the constitutional principle irrelevant.

It gives us a benchmark for understanding just how deeply American law values freedom of expression and opposition to government viewpoint discrimination.

And it makes the casual classification of ordinary dissent as “prohibited political advocacy” worth questioning.

Section 230 and the Platform-versus-Publisher Argument

This also brings up another issue I've been interested in for years: what exactly are these enormous Internet companies?

People constantly describe the issue as “platform versus publisher,” but the actual law is more complicated.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act provides that an interactive computer service generally isn't treated as the publisher or speaker of information supplied by another information-content provider. It also protects certain good-faith efforts to restrict access to material the provider considers objectionable.

SOURCE:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

In other words, the popular argument that Section 230 simply says “platforms aren't publishers” is an oversimplification.

The statute specifically protects providers from being treated as the publisher or speaker of someone else's information, while also recognizing that providers may moderate content.

That's important because my objection isn't:

“TikTok isn't allowed to have rules.”

Of course it can have rules.

My objection is to the classification of my expression.

If a platform has the enormous power to determine what millions of people can see, which advertisements are allowed to run, which political ideas receive distribution, and which expressions get classified as prohibited advocacy, then transparency and consistency matter enormously.

The bigger these platforms become, the more consequential their decisions become.

I've Been Dealing With This for Years

My concern about censorship didn't begin with TikTok.

I've spent years writing about controversial subjects, particularly 9/11, government accountability, scientific disputes, and the treatment of researchers and activists who challenge accepted narratives.

I've experienced content removals, account bans, legal threats, disappearing posts, restrictions on videos, and changes in search visibility.

I've lost YouTube channels.

I've had TikTok content removed.

I've had individual posts removed.

I've documented what I believed were search-engine and platform restrictions.

And in 2020, one of my own pages was specifically targeted by a court-order-based removal notice involving material about the Sandy Hook controversy.

SOURCE:
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2020/05/911debunkersblogspotcom-censored-via.html

Whatever one's opinion of Alex Jones or the Sandy Hook controversy, that episode raised the question I have been asking ever since:

Where exactly is the line between suppressing unlawful material and suppressing controversial discussion surrounding it?

That's a legitimate question.

My Alex Jones Argument Was Never “Everything Alex Jones Says Is True”

This is another point that gets lost.

My argument wasn't that Alex Jones is always right.

It wasn't that every Sandy Hook conspiracy claim is true.

In fact, my own article explicitly acknowledged that I hadn't personally investigated the Sandy Hook evidence deeply enough to claim certainty about the underlying controversy.

My argument was more fundamental:

Analyzing an historical event, questioning an official narrative, discussing government corruption, and considering competing explanations are forms of expression.

A person can be wrong.

A person can be offensive.

A person can be irresponsible.

And a claim can still deserve to be examined rather than simply erased.

That's the distinction I was trying to make then.

It's the same distinction I'm trying to make now.

Controversial Research Should Be Answered With Better Research

That philosophy also explains my years of involvement with 9/11 research.

I've written extensively about WTC dust, researchers such as Mark Basile, and competing claims concerning explosive or thermitic materials.

These are controversial subjects.

I have strong opinions about them.

But I don't believe controversy makes scientific investigation illegitimate.

Researchers should be criticized.

Experiments should be reproducible.

Samples should have documented provenance.

Funding should be accounted for.

Peer review matters.

And people who donate money to research have legitimate reasons to demand results.

If someone can demonstrate that an experiment was flawed, demonstrate it.

If a chemical analysis is wrong, explain why.

If a conclusion doesn't follow from the evidence, show the problem.

If another hypothesis fits the observations better, present it.

That's how inquiry is supposed to work.

You defeat bad evidence with better evidence.

The Mark Basile Controversy

One of my articles discussed chemical engineer Mark Basile and the controversy surrounding his 9/11-related research.

I wrote that Basile allegedly lost his job in connection with his research. I also discussed competing explanations, including concerns about the use of workplace laboratory resources and disputes over his research, funding, timelines, and results.

I'm not claiming that every allegation surrounding that episode has been independently proven.

In fact, that is exactly why I think the subject should remain discussable.

If a researcher was fired for misconduct, that's important.

If workplace resources were improperly used, that's important.

If his scientific conclusions were wrong, that's important.

If his public association with controversial research contributed to employment consequences, that's important too.

Those are different claims.

They should be investigated separately rather than collapsed into a convenient narrative.

SOURCE:
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2023/06/did-chemical-engineer-mark-basile-lose.html?m=1

That article also documents my dispute with another researcher over WTC dust samples that I had provided for proposed testing.

Again, reasonable people can disagree about what those events prove.

But disagreement is not a reason to make the underlying discussion disappear.

The Meeting With the Man I Suspected Might Be an Agent

There was another episode from my activism that stayed with me.

Years ago, a man contacted me through the 9/11 Truth community and wanted to meet to discuss activism.

My then-wife Angie and I agreed to meet him at a Mexican restaurant.

Initially everything seemed normal.

During the meeting, however, he began manipulating what appeared to be an electronic device in his bag. When I asked about it, I received what I remember as a mundane explanation for what the device was.

Later, the conversation became considerably stranger.

He repeatedly suggested that 9/11 activists might need to escalate their efforts toward violence.

I rejected that idea.

Completely.

Whatever someone believes about 9/11, violence isn't a substitute for evidence, investigation, journalism, or political action.

I later became suspicious that this person might have had some kind of government connection.

But I want to be precise about that:

Suspicion isn't proof.

I can document the meeting.

I can document what I remember being said.

I can describe what struck me as unusual.

I cannot honestly turn my suspicion about the man's identity into an established fact.

That distinction is important to me.

The Two Separate Janice Matthews Incidents

My late friend Janice Matthews of 911truth.org also experienced two incidents that struck me as unusual.

They were separate incidents, and I don't want them conflated.

In the first, a repairman recognized Janice from an extremely brief appearance she had made in an Alex Jones film involving protesters at the 2004 Republican National Convention.

That struck us as unusual because her appearance was so brief.

But unusual isn't proof.

The second incident involved a different man who was outside working on Janice's box.

He apparently wasn't expected or authorized to be there.

When questioned, he said he would retrieve paperwork from his vehicle.

Instead, he abruptly left.

I kept the material private while Janice was alive.

Only after her death did I feel comfortable discussing it publicly.

SOURCE:
https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2021/03/rip-brave-janice-matthews.html

Again, I don't claim that either incident proves a government operation.

What they demonstrate is something much simpler:

People involved in controversial activism sometimes encounter circumstances they find difficult to explain.

Those circumstances deserve investigation—not automatic belief, and not automatic dismissal.

That's the Standard I Want Applied to Me

This is perhaps the most important part.

I don't want a special standard for myself.

If I make a claim, challenge it.

If my evidence is bad, expose it.

If my research is flawed, demonstrate the flaw.

If I misunderstand a legal case, correct me.

If another explanation fits the facts better, show me.

I'll consider it.

That's how inquiry works.

What I object to is the opposite approach:

“We don't like this person's conclusion, therefore we shouldn't let him discuss the subject.”

That's not debunking.

That's gatekeeping.

Search, Algorithms, and the Disappearing Record

I've also become increasingly concerned about the role of search engines and recommendation algorithms.

The problem isn't merely that an article can be deleted.

A piece of information can effectively disappear if the systems people use to find information stop showing it to them.

There is legitimate academic research demonstrating that search-result rankings can influence people's opinions and preferences. Research published in PNAS and later replication work examined what researchers call the Search Engine Manipulation Effect.

That doesn't prove that Google or TikTok is secretly manipulating any particular piece of my content.

It does demonstrate something more basic:

The ordering and visibility of information can influence what people believe and what they even know exists.

That makes algorithmic transparency increasingly important.

I've documented my own concerns about search visibility and disappearing material for years.

The point isn't that every drop in search ranking proves censorship.

The point is that when information systems become the primary gateway through which people encounter reality, we should take their power seriously.

Free Speech Doesn't Mean Everyone Has to Agree With You

I don't believe free speech means TikTok must publish everything I create.

I don't believe it means YouTube has to carry every video.

I don't believe it means Facebook has to promote every opinion.

Private companies have rights.

But I do believe users have a legitimate right to ask:

What are the rules?

How are they being applied?

Are they being applied consistently?

What exactly does “political advocacy” mean?

And perhaps most importantly:

Why was this particular artistic expression classified that way?

Those are reasonable questions.

I Am Not a Partisan

I've criticized Republicans.

I've criticized Democrats.

I've criticized governments.

I've criticized corporations.

I've criticized activists.

I've criticized people on my own side of an argument.

My loyalty isn't to a political party.

It's to the principle that ordinary people should be allowed to investigate, question, criticize, create, and speak.

That's why an anti-war song doesn't need to be turned into a partisan statement.

That's why criticism of censorship doesn't automatically equal opposition to a particular government policy.

That's why telling people to watch for corruption isn't the same thing as telling them which political party to support.

And that's why I think the TikTok rejection deserves discussion.

I'm Not Afraid of Being Wrong

I believe many of the things I've spent years researching.

That's why I've spent years researching them.

But belief isn't proof.

I can be wrong.

I've been wrong before.

I'll be wrong again.

If somebody demonstrates that I'm wrong, I'll listen.

That's not weakness.

It's intellectual honesty.

The alternative is simply accepting whatever conclusion the most powerful institution tells us is acceptable.

I've never been comfortable with that.

The Principle Is Bigger Than Me

The more important point isn't whether I'm right about every controversial subject I've ever investigated.

It isn't even whether TikTok's moderator made the correct decision in my particular case.

The bigger question is what kind of information environment we want to build.

Do we want people to be able to question authority?

Do we want artists to be able to criticize war?

Do we want citizens to be able to discuss corruption?

Do we want researchers to challenge accepted explanations?

Do we want people to be able to criticize censorship itself?

I think the answer should be yes.

Not because every claim is true.

Not because every activist is trustworthy.

Not because every conspiracy theory is correct.

But because truth doesn't require censorship to survive.

If an argument is wrong, refute it.

If evidence is fraudulent, expose it.

If a researcher is mistaken, demonstrate the mistake.

If an artist is wrong, criticize the art.

If a theory doesn't survive scrutiny, let scrutiny kill it.

But don't confuse disagreement with danger.

And don't confuse political expression with political advocacy merely because someone is criticizing power.

Of, By, and For the People

That's ultimately what I'm trying to say with my music and my writing.

I want the world to be better.

I want people to be free.

I want government to remain accountable to the people.

I want corruption exposed.

I want wars questioned.

I want researchers free to investigate uncomfortable subjects.

And I want artists free to express ideas without having every criticism of censorship automatically transformed into prohibited political advocacy.

Of, by, and for the people.

Not because the people are always right.

But because no institution should be so afraid of ordinary people asking questions that questioning itself becomes forbidden.

I'm not asking anyone to believe everything I say.

I'm asking for the freedom to say it.

And if I'm wrong, argue with me.

That's what free speech is for.

Crashout Aristocrats

If you'd like to hear the music that prompted this discussion, check out Crashout Aristocrats / @CrashOut.Royalty.

The project is intentionally broad: conscious hip hop, experimental rap, humor, political commentary, absurdity, spirituality, and whatever else I feel like turning into a song.

Sometimes the message is serious.

Sometimes it's ridiculous.

Sometimes it's both.

But that's the point.

It's music.

And if somebody wants to challenge what I'm saying, I'd much rather have them listen to it and argue with me than have an algorithm decide that the conversation shouldn't happen.

---

Additional Sources

Matal v. Tam — United States Supreme Court, full opinion:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-1293_1o13.pdf

47 U.S.C. § 230 — Communications Decency Act:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/230

Townhall — Supreme Court unanimously reaffirms that offensive/disparaging speech receives constitutional protection:

https://townhall.com/news/laurettabrown/2017/06/19/supreme-court-unanimously-reaffirms-hate-speech-is-still-free-speech-n2343286

911 Debunkers — 2020 censorship/removal documentation:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2020/05/911debunkersblogspotcom-censored-via.html

911 Debunkers — Mark Basile research controversy:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2023/06/did-chemical-engineer-mark-basile-lose.html?m=1

911 Debunkers — “RIP Brave Janice Matthews”:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2021/03/rip-brave-janice-matthews.html

911 Debunkers — “Debunking the Debunkers: Fake News Leads to a Real 9/11 Truth News/WTC Dust Study Update”:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2022/03/fake-news-leads-to-real-911-truth.html?m=1

911 Debunkers — “Are They ALL Feds?”:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2023/05/are-they-all-feds.html

911 Debunkers — “Why ‘Debunkers’ Help the 9/11 Truth Movement”:

https://rense.com/general73/whyd.htm

911 Research — Demolition theories:

https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/index.html

911 Research — Collapse features:

https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/index.html

911 Research — Proofs of demolition:

https://www.911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/proofs/index.html

911 Research — Thermitic pyrotechnics in WTC dust:

https://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/thermitics_made_simple.html

911 Research — Explosive residues in WTC dust:

https://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/explosive_residues.html

When a Ghost Answers Back: The Alice Riley Investigation and the Mystery of Intelligent Hauntings

By JM Talboo 

There is a big difference between something strange happening in a supposedly haunted location and an apparent response to a question.

That distinction may be one of the most interesting things to come out of a recent episode of Expedition X.

In Season 8, Episode 5, “City of Ghosts,” the team investigates several allegedly haunted locations in Savannah, Georgia. One of the cases centers around Wright Square and the ghost of Alice Riley, a woman who was executed there in 1735.

What makes the investigation particularly intriguing is not simply that the investigators claim to encounter an apparition.

It's the apparent sequence of events.

They were looking for Alice.

They received what they interpreted as the name “Alice.”

Then they asked for a specific response.

And something appeared on thermal imaging in the precise area where they had asked the alleged spirit to go.

If the footage and interaction are accurately represented, that is considerably more interesting than simply finding an unexplained cold spot or seeing something strange in a photograph.

Because it raises a much bigger question:

Was something actually listening?

---

Who Was Alice Riley?

The historical Alice Riley was an Irish indentured servant who came to the Georgia colony in the early 1730s.

She worked for a man named William Wise. Historical accounts state that Riley and another servant, Richard White, were convicted in connection with Wise's murder in 1734.

Riley was sentenced to death.

Because she was pregnant, her execution was delayed until after she gave birth. She was ultimately hanged in Savannah on January 19, 1735. Her newborn son, James, died shortly afterward. Wright Square became associated with her execution and, eventually, with stories of her ghost.

The historical record and the later ghost story are not necessarily the same thing.

That distinction is important.

The University of North Florida's digital archive confirms the Wright Square association and records the local tradition that the square is haunted by Riley's ghost:

https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/historical_architecture_main/4333/

A historical account also points out that some of the colorful details repeated in modern versions of Riley's story may be later embellishments rather than firmly documented history:

https://www.executedtoday.com/2017/01/19/1735-alice-riley-savannah-ghost/

What is not particularly controversial is that Alice Riley existed and was executed in Wright Square in 1735.

What happened afterward is where history becomes legend.

---

The Ghost of Wright Square

The traditional haunting associated with Alice Riley is unusually specific.

According to local lore, her apparition appears as a pale or red-haired woman and is sometimes said to be searching for her baby.

Other versions of the story describe encounters with a distressed woman in Wright Square who identifies with Riley's tragic history.

Whether any of these encounters actually occurred is another question.

But there is something notable about the tradition:

The alleged apparition isn't just an anonymous ghost.

It has an identity.

It has a history.

It has a location.

And it supposedly behaves in ways consistent with the historical tragedy associated with that location.

That makes the Alice Riley case particularly useful when discussing what paranormal investigators call intelligent hauntings.

---

Not All Hauntings Are Supposed to Be the Same

The word haunting can actually describe several very different kinds of reported phenomena.

Residual Hauntings

These are supposedly repetitive events that occur without apparent awareness of the people witnessing them.

A person may repeatedly see the same figure walking down a hallway, hear the same footsteps, or observe the same event occurring over and over.

The phenomenon doesn't appear to respond.

It's more like watching a recording than interacting with a person.

Intelligent Hauntings

This is where things get much more interesting.

An intelligent haunting is one in which an apparent entity seems capable of responding to people, questions or circumstances.

If someone asks, “Are you here?” and receives an apparent response, that's one thing.

If someone asks, “Can you move over there?” and something apparently moves there, that's considerably more interesting.

The problem, of course, is determining whether the response was genuinely related to the question or whether the timing was coincidental.

Crisis Apparitions

These are reports of people apparently seeing or sensing someone around the time that person is experiencing a crisis, injury or death—sometimes at a distance.

These reports raise questions about whether consciousness could somehow be perceived independently of physical proximity.

Full or Partial Apparitions

Some reports involve apparently human figures.

Others involve only a head, torso, face, arm or other portion of a figure.

Thermal cameras add another complication because they don't record ordinary visible light. They record infrared radiation and translate temperature differences into an image.

Shadow Figures

These are generally described as dark, humanoid forms seen briefly, often in peripheral vision or low-light conditions.

Poltergeist-Type Activity

This category generally refers to apparently physical disturbances—objects moving, knocking sounds, doors opening or closing, and other environmental activity—rather than an identifiable apparition.

Electronic Phenomena

This includes alleged electronic voice phenomena, spirit-box responses, unexplained radio-like responses and other supposed communications involving technology.

And then there are cases where several categories appear to overlap.

That's where the Alice Riley investigation becomes particularly interesting.

---

The Expedition X Investigation

On Expedition X, the investigators aren't simply walking around Wright Square hoping to see something.

They attempt to communicate.

At one point, the team is attempting to establish whether the entity they're encountering might actually be Alice.

They apparently receive the name “Alice.”

That alone wouldn't prove much.

There are plenty of possible explanations for an ambiguous audio response.

It could be another word.

It could be an environmental sound.

It could be pareidolia.

It could be a coincidence.

It could even be the investigators unconsciously interpreting an ambiguous sound according to what they already expected to hear.

But then comes the more interesting part.

The investigator addresses Alice directly and asks her to perform a specific action involving a tree.

And the thermal camera subsequently records an anomalous shape moving across the scene and passing in front of the tree.

The object isn't a perfect, movie-style transparent human body.

It doesn't have clearly visible arms, legs and facial features.

Instead, what appears on the thermal footage is an approximately human-sized horizontal anomaly moving through the field of view.

And it appears in the location the investigators had just identified.

That is what makes the sequence worth discussing.

It's not simply “we saw something weird.”

It's:

“We asked for something specific, and something apparently happened in response.”

---

The Difference Between an Anomaly and a Response

This distinction is important enough to emphasize.

Suppose you put a thermal camera in a supposedly haunted building and record something strange.

That's an anomaly.

You don't yet know what caused it.

It could be a person.

It could be an animal.

It could be heat moving through the environment.

It could be an optical or thermal artifact.

It could be something associated with the camera itself.

Or it could be something genuinely unexplained.

But suppose you ask an alleged entity:

“If you're here, go stand in front of that tree.”

And then something apparently human-sized moves in front of that tree.

Now you've potentially introduced another variable:

intentionality.

The phenomenon appears to have responded to an instruction.

That is the dividing line between an unexplained event and what paranormal investigators would call an intelligent haunting.

Of course, there's still a huge burden of proof.

The response has to be demonstrated to be genuinely correlated with the request.

The possibility of coincidence has to be considered.

The camera has to be examined.

The environment has to be examined.

And, ideally, independent investigators should be able to reproduce the observation.

But if those conditions can be satisfied, a responsive phenomenon is far more interesting than a random unexplained image.

---

“Put It in a Laboratory”

There is a perfectly reasonable criticism that can be made of paranormal television investigations:

Where are the controlled experiments?

That's a fair question.

Scientific controls, repeatability, independent observation and peer review are enormously important tools for determining whether an extraordinary claim is actually supported by the evidence.

But there is a problem when those tools become absolute prerequisites rather than tools.

Imagine a haunting that supposedly occurs only at a particular historical location. The witnesses report that something happened there once—or perhaps several times—but the phenomenon doesn't appear on command.

How exactly do you reproduce that in a laboratory?

How many scientific laboratories are purportedly haunted?

And if the phenomenon is supposedly tied to a particular building, location, historical event, person or environmental condition, wouldn't removing it from that environment potentially change the experiment itself?

Unless somebody develops the Ghostbusters' equipment and figures out how to catch an alleged spirit and bring it into the laboratory, we're dealing with a methodological problem that isn't quite as simple as saying:

“Put it in a lab and reproduce it.”

This is not an argument against repeatability.

Quite the opposite.

Repeatability is one of the most valuable tools we have.

The point is that the nature of the phenomenon should determine how we attempt to test it.

A 2015 article on Debunking Death makes this argument while discussing paranormal evidence and the limitations of applying the repeatable-laboratory-result and peer-review model indiscriminately.

The article discusses a reported poltergeist case involving multiple witnesses, including police and firefighters, and argues that an event can potentially constitute evidence even when its particular circumstances make controlled laboratory repetition impossible.

It also explicitly acknowledges that paranormal phenomena have been subjected to repeatable testing and scientific experimentation.

Read the full discussion here:

https://debunkingdeath.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-repeatable-laboratory-resultpeer.html?m=1

The argument isn't that scientific methodology should be discarded.

It's that a methodology is a tool, not an infallible prerequisite for deciding whether an unusual event deserves investigation.

If a phenomenon can be repeatedly demonstrated in a laboratory, that's excellent.

If it can't, the next question should be why.

Is it because the original phenomenon wasn't genuine?

Is it because it was a coincidence?

Is it because the experiment wasn't sufficiently controlled?

Or is the phenomenon inherently dependent upon conditions that the laboratory experiment eliminated?

Those are different possibilities, and they shouldn't automatically be treated as the same conclusion.

---

What Would a Paranormal Laboratory Actually Look Like?

None of this means paranormal phenomena couldn't be studied under controlled conditions.

In fact, if someone had the resources and the willingness to do it, there are some fascinating experiments that could be designed.

One approach would be to bring supposedly haunted objects into a controlled environment rather than attempting to bring an entire haunted location into a laboratory.

Imagine a properly documented collection of objects with longstanding reputations for paranormal activity.

Place them in a dedicated facility equipped with continuous video, thermal imaging, environmental sensors, audio recording equipment and electromagnetic monitoring.

Establish a baseline before anyone interacts with the objects.

Maintain strict controls.

Document every person who enters the room.

Record everything continuously.

Then you could begin conducting experiments.

And here's where it gets particularly interesting.

If the hypothesis is that certain paranormal phenomena are somehow influenced by human attention, emotion, expectation or the history associated with a location or object, those variables could potentially be tested as well.

Researchers could compare supposedly haunted objects with control objects that look similar but have no paranormal history.

They could test periods of complete isolation against periods of human interaction.

They could document whether reported phenomena increase following attempts at communication or other traditional paranormal practices.

Even the environmental history of the experimental room could become a variable.

None of those procedures would establish beforehand that paranormal phenomena are real.

They would simply provide different conditions under which the hypothesis could be tested.

The important thing is that someone would actually have to be willing to do it.

It is easy to say:

“Put it through a controlled experiment.”

It is considerably harder to design the experiment, fund it, recruit qualified researchers, acquire the materials, maintain controls for months or years and patiently record whatever happens—including nothing happening at all.

If I ever become ridiculously wealthy, this is exactly the sort of experiment I'd be tempted to fund.

I'd buy some of the most notoriously haunted objects I could find, build a properly equipped laboratory, hire people with the appropriate scientific credentials, establish rigorous controls and start testing.

And if nothing happened?

That's data too.

But if something did happen repeatedly under controlled conditions, we'd finally have something much more substantial to argue about.

The point is not that paranormal phenomena should be exempt from investigation.

The point is that we should be creative enough to design experiments that actually give the phenomenon a chance to demonstrate whether it exists.

---

What Does Any of This Have to Do With the Afterlife?

This is where the subject becomes much more philosophical.

Most people who investigate ghosts aren't ultimately interested in ghosts merely because they're spooky.

They're interested because of one enormous question:

Does consciousness survive death?

That's the real question underneath almost everything involving hauntings.

But even that question may be too simplistic.

Suppose consciousness does survive physical death.

That doesn't necessarily tell us how it survives.

Does a person's consciousness continue indefinitely?

Does it survive for years, centuries or something else?

Does a personality remain intact?

Does memory remain intact?

Can consciousness interact with the physical world?

Could some apparent hauntings be genuine surviving personalities while others are something completely different?

We don't know.

And that's why cases involving historically identifiable individuals are particularly interesting.

The Alice Riley legend, if it reflects something genuinely paranormal, would involve a purported personality continuing to manifest nearly three centuries after the person's death.

That would at least challenge the idea that every alleged after-death manifestation must occur immediately after death.

But it still wouldn't answer the ultimate question of whether an afterlife exists.

It would simply move the question forward.

---

What If the Afterlife Doesn't Last Forever?

Here's another possibility that rarely gets discussed.

People often frame the afterlife question as binary:

Either consciousness survives death, or it doesn't.

But what if the answer is somewhere in between?

What if consciousness survives for a period of time?

What if some aspect of personality persists temporarily?

What if what people call a ghost is not an immortal soul but some kind of residual manifestation?

What if consciousness changes after death in ways we don't understand?

Or what if the apparent persistence of a person isn't actually the person at all?

These possibilities are speculative.

But that's precisely why paranormal cases should be separated into observations and interpretations.

An unexplained event doesn't automatically prove an afterlife.

But if a phenomenon can demonstrate apparently intelligent behavior, that would be a different category of problem.

---

The Alice Problem

There is another fascinating aspect of the Wright Square case.

The investigators weren't simply looking for a ghost.

They were looking for Alice.

That's a much more specific hypothesis.

If an unexplained thermal anomaly appeared in Wright Square, that would be one thing.

If an investigator asked:

“Alice, are you here?”

and received something resembling “Alice,” that would be another.

If the investigator then asked:

“Alice, can you go in front of that tree?”

and a human-sized thermal anomaly subsequently appeared in front of that tree, the sequence becomes considerably more interesting.

The critical question then becomes:

Was the sequence genuinely responsive, or are we seeing a series of coincidences that television editing has made appear connected?

That's the question that deserves investigation.

---

Television Isn't a Laboratory

There's an obvious objection that needs to be acknowledged.

Expedition X is television.

Television shows are edited.

They select footage.

They build narratives.

They have dramatic pacing.

And viewers generally aren't given every second of raw footage, every camera angle or every failed attempt.

That doesn't automatically mean the evidence shown is fake.

But it does mean that the broadcast itself isn't a controlled scientific experiment.

A compelling television segment can therefore be a reason to investigate something further without being the final proof of anything.

In fact, that's probably the fairest way to approach paranormal television in general.

Don't automatically believe it.

Don't automatically dismiss it.

Use it as a source of cases to investigate.

---

And This Is Where Corroborating Evidence Matters

The most interesting paranormal cases aren't necessarily the ones with one spectacular piece of evidence.

They're the ones where different kinds of evidence appear to point toward the same underlying phenomenon.

For example:

• A historical person is associated with a location.

• Multiple witnesses report seeing an apparition.

• The apparition allegedly behaves consistently with the historical story.

• Investigators receive apparent communication.

• A second device records something unusual.

• The unusual event occurs after a specific request.

• The response appears to happen in a specific location.

None of those things individually proves survival after death.

But if independent lines of evidence repeatedly converge, the case becomes more interesting.

That's what I mean by corroborating evidence within the evidence.

It's not merely:

“Look, a weird thing happened.”

It's:

“Look at how several pieces of information appear to interact.”

---

So, Is Alice Riley Still There?

We don't know.

And that's the honest answer.

The historical Alice Riley unquestionably existed and was executed in Savannah in 1735.

The association between Alice Riley and the alleged haunting of Wright Square is a longstanding local tradition.

People have reported encounters with an apparition they identify as Alice.

And on Expedition X, investigators recorded what they interpreted as an apparent communication followed by a thermal anomaly appearing in response to a specific request.

If that sequence represents what it appears to represent, it is fascinating.

But there are still unanswered questions.

Was the audio genuinely saying “Alice”?

Was the thermal anomaly actually a human-sized object?

Was it physically present?

Could it have been a thermal reflection, animal, person, environmental effect or camera artifact?

Was the timing genuinely responsive?

Could the entire sequence be reproduced under controlled conditions?

And, most importantly:

If something really did respond intelligently, what exactly was responding?

---

The Bigger Question

Maybe that's the most interesting thing about paranormal investigation.

We're often asking the wrong question.

We ask:

“Is that a ghost?”

But perhaps the better question is:

“What phenomenon could produce this?”

And if the answer eventually turns out to involve something we currently don't understand, then we can ask the next question.

Could it be consciousness?

Could it be something that survives death?

Could it be a phenomenon we haven't even imagined yet?

Or could it ultimately turn out to have a completely ordinary explanation?

We don't know.

But if an alleged apparition can receive a question, understand it, and deliberately respond to it, then we're no longer dealing with merely a strange photograph.

We're dealing with the possibility of interaction.

And interaction is where the ghost story becomes a scientific question.

Maybe the real question isn't whether something strange happened in Wright Square.

Maybe it's whether something was listening.

Transcript of COVID Vaxx Link To Turbo Cancers EXPOSED By Legendary Oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish!

WelcomeToHealth.blogspot.com

Transcript of COVID Vaxx Link To Turbo Cancers EXPOSED By Legendary Oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish!

Just to make crystal clear, definitely the CO 19 vaccine induces cancer and cancer that shows up at stage 4 instead of normally how it does with stage one too. It just it's it's kind called been called uh colloquially a turbo cancer. That's definite according to your opinion. >> Yes, it's definitely according to my opinion and it is backed up by just so much data. I became aware of you because when you testified uh you talked about the connection between the COVID vaccine and cancer and I just came across this yesterday. This was an interview that Dell Bigree did with an immunologist and let's listen very quickly what he says how what the mechanism is for the co 19 to cause cancer. >> You've looked at this mRNA technology. What is your opinion about the safety of the COVID vaccine that was injected into the entire world? >> So my background is medical biochemistry and looking at metabolism including RNA. In my 25 years of working on RNA, what we learned is that if you want to do anything with RNA, you shouldn't modify it, you shouldn't stabilize it, and you shouldn't inject it. So they did all of that. When they came out with this RNA idea, we kind of laughed at it because RNA has like a halflife of what 2 hours in our if it's not modified, not stabilized. So RNA, unless you modify it, you stabilize it, it's actually useless for anything. >> They took something that is supposed to leave the body quickly and made it persist. Why is that a problem? >> It's a huge problem because RNA should look at it as the blueprint of your house. This is how your cells are translating into proteins and those actually do the work. So if your blueprint is modified in the middle of the construction pattern, just give you an example, then it's going to be a disaster because it's not the same protein as you designed fragments can be formed and this is the majority of spike proteins after modification of its RNA and injections. The biggest danger is because the template stays in the cell is reverse transcription making DNA from RNA and that's the source of anoploity which we all know physicians it's more DNA in the cells that is necessary and that's a cancerous a transformed cell. So you think this could end up causing cancer? We're hearing turbo cancers, autoimmune disease issues. >> It has a huge impact. If you ask me as a medical biochemist, it's beyond a disaster. >> So what he's saying there is that the RNA then infects your cell, your DNA. It changes it and then that causes cancer. Is that what you found? >> Yes. Well, my um first observations were clinical because I noticed that my I ran a big melanoma clinic and I was doing imunotherapy 25 years ago when I was told it wouldn't work. But that is a red flag to a ball for me. I I mean they just have not perfected and worked at it and I was able to get very good responses to melanoma long before we had these big checkpoint inhibitors like Ktruder etc. And I had these patients done incredibly well. And then in the beginning of uh 20 um 21, which was after the is the end of 2021, I started to see patients relapse who'd been stable for years. You know, one of them been stable for 18 years, stage four cancers. So I had six and six weeks and uh you know, they've been between 3 and 18 years. And normally you might get a relapse if you get suddenly very depressed or get very overcome with infection or etc. These people were all perfectly happy except they weren't happy that their melanoma had come back. And so I wanted to know why why this should happen for the first time for years. I started to see relapses like like this. And I asked them as I do everything. Tell me everything. They had all been forced to have booster vaccines by their GPS because they had melanoma. And I said to myself, you know, there's there's old acronism and I found it in a in a um viology with book with vaccines in it where it basically said this as a general rule of thumb. If a vaccine needs a booster, it's pretty sure that it doesn't work. And if it if you give yet another booster, you'll almost certainly collapse the T- cell response. They they knew that 30 years ago. So everybody who brought this out and rubber stamped it is I'm accused of gross incompetence for doing this. But I thought well this must be happening. And we went to check cuz I actually had a T- cell lab because that's how I knew tea cells control the immune system. And surely enough these people's tea cells responses had formed. But before we got round to publishing it ourselves in a big way, there was a fantastic paper by um Fernis Bes who came out of Madrid who had a paper which was absolutely beautiful. It it said T-C cell exhaustion after third cove 2 SARS vaccine in cancer patients and they had you dozens and dozens of these patients and they showed that the T- cell collapse. Now for me that was enough because you've lost the control. TE-C cells control your cancer especially if the cancer's been controlled by emin therapy. But you know I tried to publish this and I published it in BMJ sort of online letters and it was taken down um and with no no communication but I knew lots of people had seen it in that brief time it was up there because they contacted me from all over the world saying we're seeing the same thing and I even contacted by surgeons who said we are seeing a total change in people who have been vaccinated uh particularly with colarctal surgery They're seeing them uh present advanced stage. Instead of one, two, cut it out, off you go. They were presenting with metastasis in the liver and the lung and they're presenting much younger. This led to the term turbo cancer which uh they all tried to downplay, but it's just hyper progressive cancer which has been recognized in iminology for years. So I thought there's something else going on here. it's not just the TE-C cell response because that wouldn't lead to this sort of turbo uh business. Something is driving it. And so I started to look at the um molecular mechanisms and I found as the speakers just said that that messenger RNA goes in and it creates a DNA which integrates into the virus and then keeps pumping this stuff out. The integration is totally random. So these things can integrate next to an a gene that will promote cancer uh or cell growth but if it's switched on permanently it will give you cancer. So these genes were shown to be overdriven and even worse it could show to it was can sit next to a cell with suppressor genes i.e. genes that will switch off cancers if they get switched on. is part of the overall control, but they were interfering with all the suppressor gene. Now, I've worked with several scientists and we had a real problem getting a lot of this um getting this uh published. In fact, we've got a paper in press at the moment which I hope doesn't get pulled because of the people interfere. But we found the same as Elder uh and his colleagues Wafik Eliri who presented at the Senate with me uh that he confirmed that they interfere with all these anti-cancer mechanisms and at the end of the day we counted at least 12 mechanisms how these vaccines can induce uh or um promote cancer. It is it's really frightening. Now, just one mechanism is enough to call a red card and say, "Halt, halt. We don't want to be giving a whole generation of people early cancer, and nobody seems to be of any interest." And all they did, I got accused of spreading misinformation. I said, "I'm not spreading this information. I'm trying to stop you killing my, you know, my patients and your patients." And that's what staggered me. There's there's no debate uh allowed. There's no science allowed to be discussed. >> So this never happened before in your career. You never saw anything like this. This kind of censorship, the suppression of scientific research that you did, the scientific debate which is essential for science to happen. You never saw this before. What what what do you think drove this? What was this? Seems like a uh as if some kind of mangala figure took over the whole western world science. Uh what what what do you equate this with? >> Well, I I mean I thought about that very deeply too and because I cannot understand it. I was brought up in good faith. You do science in good faith. You might make some hypothesis and uh you rely on other scientists to show you're wrong and to show no this is the way and gradually science builds up and you get a very good understanding. It can also be knocked off course by another finding that completely uh knocks away your rationale for your findings. But this was all killed in COVID. Um I never saw it really in in cancer research. I I'll be honest there. I mean everybody seemed to want for the better. I was unaware of any major um suppression cancellation in cancer research. But what was interesting knowing what I was seeing and know now in CO I realized this had been going on very subtly in HIV days and what was the one thing in common between HIV and COVID? Tony Fouchy. >> Ah >> Tony Fouchy being he was given far too much control. He is a is a total egotist narcissist and dictator and a very vile person in my view because anybody who crossed him he basically tried to bury them take away their grants not give their grants uh interfere with with grant committees it was just unbelievable and I spotted this behavior in the HIV days and once again there's a lot of parallels with HIV and COVID you know the introduction of fear Yeah, be very afraid, you know, nobody's safe until everyone's safe, all this business, you know, take all these precautions and go to hospital and have these drugs. And in HIV days, it was AZT, which was a reurposed anti-cancer leukemic drug that was deemed too toxic for cancer patients. So why on earth would you use it and push it for HIV when it was known that if you treated the patient well um and you know made them healthy that they didn't progress uh fast in the way that it did say they needed AZ in fact AZT actually caused further immune suppression in fact you could say that there's an age one of them is AZT induced immune depression uh syndrome So and that of course the modern version of what we saw with AZT in COVID was run rem desave or as the nurses called it run death is near because it had a 5% mortality rate. You didn't need drugs like this the ordinary ordinary simple drugs and we we been through all this. I was preaching you just need to treat COVID with standard respiratory drugs, things like highdose vitamin D, uh soluble aspirin, uh the um the first defense type things which used to contain interferon or alpha lipids up your nose and uh if you got the cough started going down, you use the steroid spray becide just like an asthmatic and if it went down below, you use dexamethasone. Now those very simple things would save the vast majority of people who died of COVID. But certainly in the UK we followed the same textbook now that that Fouchy wrote for us. Do nothing until they need to go to hospital. And then I found when I was in the states that the doctors were paid for each per patient they treated with rem desave when you know simple real treatments would work very well. I was horrified to find out in the UK they inflicted a randomized trial on everybody who was breathless in the hospital they called it recovery. Now it was six different drugs, one of which was dexamethasone and the only one that was effective was dexamethasone. Well, every respiratory physician worth his salt knows that is mandatory. You must use that. So one of my colleagues calculated that that trial killed four and a half thousand people by uh designing it so they wouldn't get dexamethasone. I mean this is this is the absolute big tragedy and crisis and again going back to um HIV you know Fouchy was involved in studies uh that he wanted a positive study from or he wanted a negative. We saw this exactly the same in COVID with hydroxychloricquin and and ivormectin and these things. These these were superb anti-covid drugs and I believe it was a crime to tell people not to have these because the only reason they did this is now very obvious they wanted to be able to inflict the vaccine program on us. And it is well known if you have something that uh greatly reduces the chances of dying like I have amein hydro you cannot possibly justify a vaccine program. So I think we're uncovering an enormous crime uh against humanity by the people who pushed all this stuff. But at the end of the day Fouchy was the lead conductor. But but so why uh I I would I I had someone who worked for this show who bought every piece of propaganda pushed by big pharma and the media and Tony Fouchy and I was trying to show him that no there you're being lied to as usual by big pharma and the pharma bought media. Um and he said oh really every doctor in the world is being is going along with this. So I didn't know at the time that doctors like you and doctors like Peter McCulla and Per Corey and uh Robert Malone were being censored. I didn't know that at the time. So I didn't have >> I didn't know what to say back. But you know most doctors still go along with it today. And so isn't are are you like how how disappointed or chag grinned or just mind blown are you by the I mean if you knew this stuff and other why didn't more doctors stand up and say something do you think why why did why did doctors just go along with this if they knew Ivormectin was I knew d ivvermekin was a human medicine I knew ivor ivormectin won the Nobel prize for human medicine it saved millions of lives so doctors must have certainly known this why weren't doctors pushing back against this. Why would they go along with this death vaccine and not push a safe drug like ivormectin? I agree it is an unbelievable question to ask but I think I can partially answer it is because the control of the health services and the uh the medical councils absolutely punished anybody who didn't obey the the path of you must do vaccine you mustn't give uh ivormectin etc. I mean it was unbelievable and I know people who lost their jobs. I mean even somebody who committed suicide because they just couldn't stand it. They was they didn't have a single COVID desk death but they were struck off because they had used ivormectin. I mean this is unbelievable madness. And so it is like a warning to the others. So the others got frightened. Other people get put on leave. They get struck off for the most simple things. And I've been defending these people whether it be in the the UK, Australia, New Zealand. And what is incredible and in other places in Europe. Now what is actually incredible is that the this has come tumbling down from the top in all the countries. It's identical. The first thing you must do is induce fear and prosecute any doctor that steps out out of line. Now I uncovered with a guy a good friend and very experienced in law that all this was highly illegal because ingrained and and I'm I'm not sure of US law. I'm not a US lawyer. At any rate with regards to Europe and Australia and New Zealand are very very similar. There is actually in embedded in the law a thing called the magisterial formula. It's embedded as a fundamental right. And what it says is that no doctor can possibly be uh punished for um doing the best for the patient, his patient, providing its informed consent even if it breaches uh government guidelines. I mean it's actually there. So they are breaking their own law. They don't even know their own law. So why is were they first rule number one shoot all the doctors who who stray out of line? Why would you do that? I mean they completely deprofessionalized my profession that I went into very proudly. I'm now disgusted with it. >> So how did Dr. Fouchy get the head of the uh NHS to go along, the people in New Zealand to go along, the people in Australia to go along? So it was a top- down thing. And I know like here in California, the government actually would dispar uh doctors who talked about Ivormectin and they did it under and it got held up in court. They did it under the idea that that was called conduct. And so that was instead of being free speech uh to give a doctor give his professional opinion to his to his patient. They called that bad conduct and they would get them to spar take away their license. And so that by the way that just got overturned, Pier Cory's case just got overturned in in the United States. So that's a big deal. We're going to cover that Monday. So that's a big big deal. Um but um so what why would the go so is it just because of big pharma money? Is that really what it was that they they can corrupt every country like that? It all came from Mona and Fizer funding. We we know that that the medical journals are corrupt. We know that. But all the like every head of a hospital, every the head of the NHS, the head they were all under the thumb of big money. Yeah. Well, they we I know with regards to the um NHS, etc. Um that Fouchy uh phoned our top guys personally and basically told them what to think. Their job was to question what is this guy telling us to do? This is madness. You know, they they just did what they said. how he had such power and influence is a disaster and no individual should ever have that again. But yes indeed it was top down because I said I've been to these places trying to defend doctors who've been charged with being very good doctors only to find the same phrases come up all the time. The same attitude and these are in countries which would normally like to pin themselves. Oh, we have a much better system than X or so and so me and yet they all did exactly the same. But they're all incredibly guilty. We must we have to reform the system so this can never ever happen again. And I do believe it all came out the whole thing came out of the the the DARPA plan to basically have uh everything ready for the next pandemic without actually realizing. Now the irony is is that if you didn't have these plans for rapid vaccines and do all the search behind them, you would never have a pandemic. And the pandemics have been artificially manufactured by the WH which basically has got far too much money, far too much influence and nothing to do. So they basically are literally manufacturing the pandemics. Now when I sort realized COVID came out of the Wuhan lab, no ifs, no buts, 100% can absolutely impossible for any other explanation what anybody else says. And um Steven Key is one of your your best brightest scientists in the US also presented to Senate you know ba basically on um the a basic big computerized analysis he he does basian he does basian mathematical analysis it showed that the virus was 100% from the lab or 99.999% recurring. So you know we know all that. So why did that they all basically stamped this down? Well, the reason I I really believe they stamped this down is because they were all pushed into this by big farmer who basically this is obvious. I mean they said we're not going to invest this money unless we get a guaranteed return. And this all goes back to your 1986 vaccine identity act. He removed the liability from all big farmer when there was just a handful of vaccines and ever since then now there are about 72 and uh the the checking for whether they are one work or two are dangerous has been kind of totally removed. Well having got emboldened with that they basically want to create new pandemics so they can use all this technology for another another pandemic. And I look back at all the past pandemics and I think that none of them would have occurred if it wasn't for human interference and laboratories and leaks and that's big. And with regards to your question with regards big farmer, I would just like to point out something that's just recently happened. Madna have just had a messenger flu RNA vaccine approved by FDA. It was the same panel that uniformly said that on the evidence given it's not as good as the ones we've got and two it's a lot more dangerous. They were asked to reconsider their ridiculous uh decision and they 100% changed their mind and said okay okay okay all right it's all right you can have it now why would why would on the same data you change your recommendation to a big farmer when just think about it FDA FDA big farmer complete rotation on our side in the UK we have the MH that's your FDA and the two top people 50 years between them experience in FISA. I mean this is a total revolving door and a totally unacceptable way for drugs and vaccines to be regulated. >> So you're saying that the vaccine the COVID vaccine was not created for the COVID pandemic. You're saying that they created the COVID pandemic for the COVID vaccine because they wanted to use this mRNA COVID vaccine. That's what you're saying. Well, I I if I I would say that only a madman would think that, but when you actually look back at all the evidence, they were doing all this gain of function work. Um why would you do a go gain of function to make an ordinary dopey virus that would just give you a bit of a flu? Why would you make it much more dangerous? And their aim was to make it much more infectious for human cells. and they say in defense this is so uh when it gets out or a similar virus comes out there we can make a vaccine quicker for it. They don't realize the irony if they hadn't been doing this it would never have gone out and there would be no natural virus that caused that type of chaos. And I honestly believe that the other ones including bird flu, swine flu and things uh Ebola all these ones they try and scare scare us with. I believe that they're all as a result of this desire >> gain of function >> to make vaccines for things that and most vaccines are not needed. You know, that's that is my other thing that I've come across. I was horrified how I've been lied to by um by my education. uh you know we would we are really groomed that vaccines are the biggest success story of world medicine ever you know and if it wasn't for that we'd all be dead you know and that has to be really one of the biggest con lies and I mean I like everyone else felt for it was co that gave me the telescopes and the microscopes to start looking at what's really going on and it was it's horrifying how much we've been lied to and misled So, do you do you think we'll ever get to a place where the majority of people agree with what you just said? >> You know, that's that's an incredible uh incredible um question. Can I just tell you uh something which I think I can't answer the question question yes or no but what I can tell you something is that what I have noticed is the more educated people are the higher up the rank they are doctor or a scientist the more they will disagree with me and they won't uh uh change their minds or it will be very tough but if I go to my local village and I go into the the local pub or so and the people there, they are not sort of top doctors or scientists. They're workmen, they're builders or policemen or this, that, and the other. Do you know what I find? I find that they've all all agree with me. I mean, they picked it all up. They come up to me and thank me, buy me a beer, and say, "Thank God there's somebody up there who who does know all this is going because they worked it all out themselves. They they've worked out that um you know they got friends who died of strokes and heart attacks after they rolled the vaccine out and now they've got people and it's happening to me all the time. I mean I' I've had a couple of uh deaths and people I know very well in the last month and they'd all receive booster vaccines and they both died of turbo cancer, you know. So I'm actually I don't need to see the patients. I don't need to see all this wonderful data which I actually have uh quite a bit here. I've got all the data from Rojson sitting there how the cancer instance has gone through how it correlates with the booster viruses etc. So I believe that the people out there are gradually coming round to it. The elite as I call them uh the the elite whose entire careers and everything depend on funding but from a very corrupt system. They will be the last to change their minds. But the man on the street I believe has already changed his mind. And the young people lot I would say the majority of young people have cottoned on that this is a fraud and that co destroyed their lives their education and if they've had too many vaccines their health. They they know what the governments are trying to do is drag this into the long grass and drag it out to the point where everybody will say, "Oh, move on. Move on. Forget about it. Forget about it." No, that is not what we are to do. They have got to hold everybody to account like they did Tony Fouchy last week. Um, and they have to hold everybody account and they got to punish them so nobody ever thinks of doing this again because if you don't, it will happen again. That's the whole reason for the WH. >> So just to make crystal clear definitely the CO 19 vaccine induces cancer and cancer that shows up as stage 4 instead of normally how it does with stage one too. It just it's it's kind called been called uh colloquially a turbo cancer. That's definite according to your opinion. Yes, it's definitely according to my opinion and it is backed up by just so much data and this again tells you what's going on. There was a paper published in um in curious uh a it's an article which were is a journal that publishes articles that might be a little bit contentious but it was on the office of national statistics of Japan and it was in millions of patients and they showed very clearly that each booster vaccine induced more cancers and that was an interesting paper because it wasn't just limited to what I call the imological cancers like melanoma etc. a whole range of cancers. So that was the first one that told me that the possibility of these viruses driving uh new cancers and promoting old cancers was real. Now what happened with this had been through every kind of review. The results were so important that it was hyper review. It was published and then a load of bots come up and say this has got flaws. the we don't like the methods. Take it down. The editor said no. Um I'll send it out to review again. And then he said there's no problem. Guess what happened to that journal? Nature Springer bought it out and then removed the paper and then said carry on. This is what's going it's going on at a very very high level. and uh colleagues of mine have identified that FISA uh pay a team of people to go through every journal basically targeting and attacking the editor to remove it if it suggests that its vaccines are anything less than safe and effective and that is definitely going on and it h you know we know it happened um in the COVID boom era we know that and this is you mentioned Pier Corey but have you I mean it was he did brilliant work with the ivormectin and it was clear that it worked very well and guess what the big farmer were paying your CBC's and Walgreens etc to dishonor Ivormectin scripts i.e. to ignore them. I mean, this is the level this is the level of interference and corruption that's been going on and we have to get rid of it because otherwise we're never going to have uh we're never going to have good health actually because um this has made me go all the way into everything. I mean I I've spoken to people who used to work for FISA who said the culture there is we're not interested in cures, we're only interested in expanding markets. Well, that that fits that fits with what I see. So the the spike protein they thought now it's come out in in emails and Tony Fouch's diary that he knew it was a bad idea and he was advised by people in fact the guy who discovered the HIV virus and a that he there's an email from him to Tony saying hey this don't don't do a a treatment with this spike protein cuz this is a bad idea. Yeah, I think that was Luke Montany, wasn't it? >> I think so. And >> yeah, I think it is. And who unfortunately he made a big fuss about it and ended up um dying. Uh we don't we don't know exactly why, but some people have been very suspicious because he had tremendous clout being a Nobel Prize winner, >> right? Yes. He he won the Nobel Prize and he there's an email from him telling Anthony Fouchi, don't do this. a bad idea to use this spike protein because it creates in, you know, your body's going to attack itself and >> he exactly the same as I said. I mean, it's incredible. So, it it there just wasn't one or two or three of us. There was lots of us, but we were all silenced, but just certain people like certainly like me, no one was going to shut me up because I'm past myself by date. I, you know, I I don't have to uh work uh in order to survive. And so I was prepared and he was prepared too. But he he was a real kind of threat to them. And I'm I must say I'm suspicious from because I know I knew Luke and Bob Gallow too because I had done this receptor in ' 84 and we had you know probably four meetings a year where around the world where we all got together and uh so know all this. So he he was absolutely spot on when I I saw Luke. Luke copied me in on this by the way. So I was aware of this >> and then and so then Tony So Tony Fouche completely ignored that >> and went ahead with it anyway and then this guy who's a Nobel Prize winner who warned him about it and then was going to make a stink about it. He died suspiciously. >> Exactly. Very. >> What was Do you know what the official cause of death was that they say? >> No, I don't. I honestly don't. I can't get get I cannot get anything out other than that they're very suspicious >> that you know he wasn't particularly unwell at the time uh why he suddenly died and you know people of his age and that they do die from time to time but you do get a bit suspicious when he was clearly a major thorn being a Nobel Prize winner saying this is mad I mean I was saying it that this was mad exactly the same as Luke Montany But I it was easy to dismiss me uh and certainly my own colleagues dismiss me as I'm a sort of maverick cancer doctor and I know nothing about vaccines and iminology which is actually nearly laughable because they know even less. >> Yeah. Hey, come see me do a live celebrity panel August 30th in Burbank, California. Then stand up in New York City at Village Underground September 13th. And then in Chicago September 18, 19, and 20 in Rosemont and Chicago. Go to jimmy.com for a link for tickets.