Mind Treasury: September 2019

Monday, September 30, 2019

Before we try to impeach you, would you please ban the guns for us?

What An Idiot: Dems Want to Impeach Trump But Schumer Expects Him to Work With Them On Gun Control
Beth Baumann | Sep 30, 2019 8:15 PM

What An Idiot: Dems Want to Impeach Trump But Schumer Expects Him to Work With Them On Gun Control
Source: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Sunday called on President Donald Trump to continue working with Congress on gun control measures despite Democrats' official impeachment inquiry over a call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Specifically, Schumer wants Trump to consider backing universal background checks, a bill known as HR 8 that passed in the House earlier this year.

“Amidst the impeachment inquiry the gears of government can still move. Anyone who suggests otherwise is advancing a false narrative,” Schumer said at his Manhattan office on Sunday, the New York Post reported. “In fact, the best example of governing for this president … would be to pass the universal background bill, which has been sitting on the door step of the Senate for well over 200 days.”

Schumer's call comes after Trump met with National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre last week.

“President Trump must do whatever it takes to resist the clouded comfort he craves from the likes of Wayne LaPierre and the NRA, because it will lead to inaction on one of the single biggest issues Americans want addressed: universal gun background checks,” Schumer said in a statement. “I challenge President Trump today to govern. Allowing the NRA or other nefarious interests to call the shots amid this impeachment inquiry will only backfire on this White House, and the American people will be worse off for it. Congress can still move on major issues while the House impeachment inquiry advances, and it must."

Democrats have focused on pushing universal background checks, which would require a background check to take place for private sales and transfers as well as a ban and "buyback" of so-called "assault weapons."

The reason pro-gun advocates are against universal background checks is because it turns legal, law-abiding gun owners into criminals. If I want to let a friend or family member borrow a rifle for hunting we would have to go to a federal firearms licensee (FFL), he or she would have to go through a background check and the firearm would have to be transferred to their name. And when the gun is to be returned to me, I would have to undergo the same process. We would have to legally transfer firearms, on paper, in order for it to be legal. I couldn't let the person borrow the rifle, even if I know they're law-abiding and not a prohibited possessor.

The same process holds true for a domestic violence survivor who fears for her life. If I let her borrow a firearm for self-protection, without a background check and transfer, we'd both be criminals.

And if we want to take someone new to the range to shoot for the very first time, the same thing would happen. No background check? It's illegal.

But these are the kind of narratives we never hear anything about. They're the unintended consequences that these proposals would have. And, honestly, how many criminals actually go to a gun store and buy a firearm? They don't. They obtain them on the black market. That's not something that can be legislatively fixed. All it does it punish those of us who follow the law.

Advertisement
Around the Web
This IRS Law is Sweeping Local Area
Millennials Don't Like These Brands Anymore and They're Struggling
Federal Program Will Pay Off Your Home If You Live In U.S.
Men, You Don't Need the Blue Pill if You Do This Once Daily
Recommended from Townhall

Grassley: It's Time to Follow Up on My July 2017 Letter About the DNC and Ukraine

Hey Democrats, Impeach This!

Rep. Chris Collins to Resign Following Insider Trading Indictment

Fake News: No, Three White Boys Did Not Pin Down A Black Girl And Cut Her Hair Last Week At Karen Pence's School

'Nazi Scum!' Antifa Blocks Elderly Couple From Crossing the Street

Video: SNL's Hilarious Mockery of the Democratic Debates

Another hate hoax

Skip to content
Alex Jones' InfoWars
THE ALEX JONES RADIO SHOW
LISTEN NOWWATCH NOW

ANOTHER HATE HOAX: BLACK GIRL WHO CLAIMED WHITE CLASSMATES CALLED HER NAMES, CUT HER DREADS — ADMITS SHE MADE IT ALL UP!
12-year-old claimed she was pinned, called racial slurs by students at school where Vice President Mike Pence’s wife is a teacher
Adan Salazar | Infowars.com - SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 77 Comments
Another Hate Hoax: Black Girl Who Claimed White Classmates Called Her Names, Cut Her Dreads -- Admits She Made it All Up!
A student at a private middle school in Virginia claimed she was targeted for harassment last week by white students who yelled racial slurs and cut her hair.

On Monday, she admitted all those allegations were false.

Police confirmed an investigation was underway last Friday after Amari Allen, 12, told local media that three white boys at the Immanuel Christian School, where Vice President Mike Pence’s wife teaches, pinned her down and assaulted her, calling her “nappy,” and “ugly,” while they covered her mouth and used scissors to snip her dreadlocks.

Local NBC affiliate WRC-TV reported the “heartbreaking story” last Thursday:

Three sixth-grade boys at a Christian school in Northern Virginia pinned down a black classmate and cut off some of her dreadlocks while telling her her hair was “nappy” and “ugly,” she told News4.

Twelve-year-old Amari Allen said the three boys, who she said are white, cut off her hair on Monday. She’s a student at Immanuel Christian School in Springfield, Virginia, where Vice President Mike Pence’s wife, Karen Pence, teaches part-time.

“They said my hair was nappy and I was ugly,” she said.

On Monday, however, Allen’s legal guardians met with school officials before releasing a statement apologizing to the students blamed and saying the whole event was fabricated.

“To those young boys and their parents, we sincerely apologize for the pain and anxiety these allegations have caused,” reads a statement by Allen’s grandparents sent to The Washington Post.

“To the administrators and families of Immanuel Christian School, we are sorry for the damage this incident has done to trust within the school family and the undue scorn it has brought to the school. To the broader community, who rallied in such passionate support for our daughter, we apologize for betraying your trust.”

“We understand there will be consequences and we’re prepared to take responsibility for them,” they added. “We know that it will take time to heal, and we hope and pray that the boys, their families, the school and the broader community will be able to forgive us in time.”

Police would not comment on the investigation to The Post due to juveniles being involved.

Immanuel Christian School Principal Stephen Danish also released a statement confirming the hoax and sympathizing with the “victims and the hurt on both sides of this conflict.”

“We can now confirm that the student who accused three of her classmates of assault has acknowledged that the allegations were false. We’re grateful to the Fairfax County Police Department for their diligent work to investigate these allegations,” Danish wrote.

“While we are relieved to hear the truth and bring the events of the past few days to a close, we also feel tremendous pain for the victims and the hurt on both sides of this conflict. We recognize that we now enter what will be a long season of healing.”

The event was bought hook, line and sinker by the lapdog media which has increasingly green-lighted hate hoaxes in the Trump era, and is reminiscent of the hoax perpetrated by actor Jussie Smollett in Chicago earlier this year, in which he claimed he was assaulted by two white Trump supporters who put a noose around his neck and yelled “MAGA country” while he tried to grab a Subway sandwich in below-freezing Chicago temperatures.

Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar

On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins

On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735

On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars

With Jussie Smollett’s slap on the wrist, leftists have been given the green light to stage attacks as many times as they want with almost no repercussions until one sticks.

By the way, we’re currently running our biggest sale since Christmas! Get 50% off products with double Patriot Points and free shipping during our Black Friday Comes Early Sale!

WATCH LIVE

RELATED ARTICLES
NY Times Removes Race Context After Black Girl Admits Faking Hate Crime
NY TIMES REMOVES RACE CONTEXT AFTER BLACK GIRL ADMITS FAKING HATE CRIME
U.S. NEWS
Comments
SNL Suggests Assassinating President Trump Instead Of Impeachment
SNL SUGGESTS ASSASSINATING PRESIDENT TRUMP INSTEAD OF IMPEACHMENT
U.S. NEWS
Comments
BUSH-ERA ETHICS LAWYER SAYS TRUMP SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO COMMAND MILITARY AFTER “CIVIL WAR” TWEET
U.S. NEWS
comments
TRUMP SUGGESTS ADAM SCHIFF SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR TREASON
U.S. NEWS
comments
SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTS INSTALL ANTI-HOMELESS BOULDERS ON SIDEWALK
U.S. NEWS
comments
COMMENTS

SEARCH
Search for articles

LISTEN TO THE ALEX JONES SHOW – HERE'S HOW
Podcast | Listen | On Demand | Archive
WEEKDAYS 11–3PM AND SUNDAY 4–6PM
How To Get The Banned Infowars Podcasts On Your Smartphone - Find out how to subscribe to our shows!
WATCH LIVE NOW

LATEST STORIES
How to Counter Trump Impeachment
Barr Asks Trump to Reach Out to Other Countries in Criminal Probe of Deep State Coup Ring
Watch: What Happens In Vegas Stays In Vegas
UK Band Massive Attack Flashes Q, Epstein Messages at Concert
Stop The Madness: Blistering GOP Ad Hammers Democrat Insanity
Over 60 Miles of NEW Border Wall Announced
GET INFORMED
Get the latest breaking news & specials from Alex Jones and the Infowars crew.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
hello world
VISIT OUR STORESHOP HERE
COME AND TAKE IT BETO O’ROURKE 2ND AMENDMENT T-SHIRT
Your Price: $29.95
On Sale: $19.95
Beto O'Rourke let Americans know in the third debate he was coming for your guns - send a message back that it won't be that easy!

BUY NOW

LEARN MORE
ILLUSTRATION

Next
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
POLLS
Will Hillary Clinton jump into the 2020 race?

Yes.
No.
God I hope so.
View Results

Radio
Video
NewsWars
PPTV
Store
Infowars Life
T.O.S.
Archive
Advertise
Watch Alex Jones Show
Most Recent
D.M.C.A.
Corrections
About Alex Jones Show
Subscribe
Contact

RADIO SHOW▼
NEWS▼
VIDEOS▼
STORE
BREAKING NEWS
CONTACT▼
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE

Pope advises caution in field of AI

WATCH TV LIVE
MENU
LIVE
Pope Francis: AI Could Produce 'Barbarism' in Human Activity
Pope Francis: AI Could Produce 'Barbarism' in Human Activity(AP)
By Todd Beamon
Monday, 30 Sep 2019 12:54 PM

Join in the Discussion!

Pope Francis has warned Silicon Valley executives that artificial intelligence and other new technologies could lead to "an unfortunate regression to a form of barbarism" that threatens "all areas of human activity."

"The remarkable developments in the field of technology, in particular those dealing with artificial intelligence, raise increasingly significant implications in all areas of human activity," Pope Francis said last week at a conference featuring technology executives, theologians and academics at the Vatican.

"For this reason, open and concrete discussions on this theme are needed now more than ever," the Pope said, according to Reuters.

In warning of the moral problems that could result from such new technologies, Pope Francis said: "If mankind's so-called technological progress were to become an enemy of the common good, this would lead to an unfortunate regression to a form of barbarism dictated by the law of the strongest."

The conference, held Thursday to Saturday, was entitled "The Common Good in the Digital Age," according to the report.

Among those serving as panelists included Mozilla cofounder and executive chairwoman Mitchell Baker and Gavin Corn, director of Facebook's cyber security law team, Reuters reports.

Vatican officials, according to the report, suggested that the conference could be used for a future papal document on artificial intelligence.

Magic path current challenge: observing fingers

Watch your fingers while eating, walking, talking, or having a rest. What do they do while you are deep in the flow of your thoughts? ...The purpose of stalking is twofold: first, to move the assemblage point as steadily and safely as possible, and nothing can do the job as well as stalking: second, to imprint its principles at such a deep level that the human inventory is bypassed, as is the natural reaction of refusing and judging something that may be offensive to reason.” C.Castaneda "The Fire From Within" Type: stopping the internal dialogue Difficulty: low

A course in miracles day 27

Lesson 27
Above all else I want to see.
1 Today's idea expresses something stronger than mere determination. It gives vision priority among your desires. You may feel hesitant about using the idea on the ground that you are not sure you really mean it. This does not matter. The purpose of today's exercises is to bring the time when the idea will be wholly true a little nearer.

2 There may be a great temptation to believe that some sort of sacrifice is being asked of you when you say you want to see above all else. If you become uneasy about the lack of reservation involved, add:

3 Vision has no cost to anyone.

4 If fear of loss still persists, add further:

5 It can only bless.

6 The idea for today needs many repetitions for maximum benefit. It should be used at least every half hour, and more often if possible. You might try for every 15 or 20 minutes. It is recommended that you set a definite time interval for using the idea when you wake or shortly afterwards and attempt to adhere to it throughout the day. It will not be difficult to do this, even if you are engaged in conversation or otherwise occupied at the time. You can still repeat one short sentence to yourself without disturbing anything that is going on.

7 The real question is how often will you remember? How much do you want today's idea to be true? Answer one of these questions, and you have answered the other. You will probably miss several applications and perhaps quite a number. Do not be disturbed by this, but do try to keep on your schedule from then on. If only once during the day you feel that you were perfectly sincere while you were repeating today's idea, you can be sure that you have saved yourself many years of effort.

Trump did nothing wrong

Skip to content
Primary Menu
National Review
Search National Review
Search Text
Search
Sep. 30, 2019
SUBSCRIBE

LOGIN
WHITE HOUSE
Why I Think Trump Did Nothing Wrong in His Phone Call with Zelensky
By LUKE THOMPSON
September 29, 2019 6:30 AM

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, September 25, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
Opponents of the president have elevated his person above his position.
I had a great discussion on The Editors Thursday about my view that President Trump did nothing wrong in his July 25 phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. My view seems to be the minority position, so it makes sense to lay it out as clearly as possible.

Much of the confusion around this case stems from the entanglement of two groups specializing in bamboozlement: lawyers and spies. Espionage and the law have specialized argots that hide fabrication and skulduggery. Nonetheless, critical analysis reveals that the call was in bounds and that objections to it reduce to absurdity.

My argument relies on an assertion, a distinction, and showing the absurdity of the other side of the argument taken to its logical conclusions.

First, the assertion: The United States government has a compelling interest in knowing if its private citizens are involved in corruption abroad, either alone or in concert with current, former, or future public officials. This is not a controversial claim, yet when applied to what we know about how Joe Biden conducted his vice presidency in relation to his son Hunter Biden’s career, it invites unwarranted controversy.

Here are the facts. The decision of Joe Biden, while vice president, to facilitate his son Hunter’s international business dealings presents, minimally, the appearance of a conflict of interest. Indeed, anything that Hunter Biden touched that intersected, however tangentially, with the official doings and responsibilities of his father can be presumed to be a worthy subject of investigation unless and until proven otherwise. The younger Biden’s shady dealings with his uncle dating at least to 2008, his absurd (and absurdly lucrative) board post on the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, his massive financing rounds in China, and his travel to these countries along with his father, the latter acting in his official capacity — all raise major questions.

NOW WATCH: 'Trump Claims He Had 'Nothing to Do' with Pence's Stay at Irish Trump Resort'

Because Hunter Biden repeatedly profited in countries where his father was conducting official business, despite having no marketable skills or relevant experience, these questions would exist even if he were a paragon of personal virtue. Yet we know that he is not. His fiscal profligacy, repeated battles with addiction, and seeming erotomania, make Billy Carter, Hugh Rodham, and Roger Clinton look like Boy Scouts. Indeed, Hunter Biden is recreationally closer to Hunter Thompson than he is to most ne’er-do-well political relatives. Hunter Biden is clearly a person who should not be anywhere near government.

As a result, in the absence of clear and convincing proof that nothing is amiss in the Biden family business, there is a presumptive case for looking into the Bidens to see if all the smoke surrounding Hunter came from fire. Joe Biden didn’t choose to have a troubled son. But he did choose to integrate his troubled son into his official functions. The burden of proving that the interpenetration of government and family did not enrich the younger Biden falls squarely on the elder Biden. He has not met that burden because, given the facts already known, doing so is probably impossible.

Joe Biden wishes to be president. The American people have a right to know if, as second in line to the presidency, he facilitated his family’s enrichment. Did he do so consciously or through blind irresponsibility? He flew Hunter Biden to China on an official visit: What did Joe think Hunter was doing on that trip? If nothing is amiss, follow the administration’s response to this scandal and open the books. Until that happens, an investigation — whether formal or informal — is justified.

Second, my distinction: Information is not interference. Based on the call transcript, Trump asked Zelensky to get to the bottom of whether Ukraine or Ukrainians interfered in the 2016 election. One may consider Trump’s concerns absurd or silly. Alternatively, one may suspect Ukrainian involvement. I do not know and will not pretend to know, because whether Ukraine was actually involved is irrelevant. The request for information that the Ukrainian president may be uniquely positioned to offer is fair and does not, in and of itself, constitute election interference.

The president is well within his rights to seek information from his counterparts abroad. He can ask Zelensky if the Dodgers will make the World Series, or who Zelensky thinks is the most formidable Democratic candidate. Soliciting information, in the form of facts or opinion, does not constitute election interference. It does not constitute having a foreign head of state do opposition research for the Trump campaign. It is not some of in-kind contribution.

Nor is there anything wrong with the president using leverage to get answers to his questions. Ukraine is not in NATO. Ukraine has been an ally of the United States some of the time, but at other times has been a de facto extension of the Russian Federation. And while the United States owes Ukraine certain obligations owing to the Budapest Memorandum, obligations the last administration ignored, Ukraine does not enjoy a constitutional or treaty right to Javelin missiles. Regardless of whether or not Trump asks important questions or stupid ones, by virtue of his office, he has the right to ask what he wants and use the leverage he controls to get answers. Because the national interest is served by those questions, even if they also align with Trump’s perceived political self-interest, a quid pro quo is not a problem.

While the seeking of information does not intrinsically constitute a problem — indeed, it’s exactly the sort of thing we want the president doing in exchanges with foreign heads of state — what Trump chooses to do with the information he receives matters immensely. Were Trump to pass documents to his campaign, that would blend his official powers with his electioneering apparatus, which is against campaign-finance law. Were Trump to tell Zelensky to leak whatever damaging information he might find about Biden, that too would constitute election interference. Obviously, if Trump asked Zelensky to target Biden or his campaign with hacking, it would be a crime. If he asked Zelensky to fabricate information and leak it to the public, this impeachment talk would be completely justified.

Yet Trump did not do these things. He asked for information that might help him serve the national interest in his capacity as president. Whether one trusts Trump to act accordingly or not is not itself impeachable in the absence of action. Similarly, that Trump failed to follow up regarding his invocation of Attorney General Barr is neither a problem nor surprising given his lackluster organizational tendencies.

But what if we were to treat the request for information as tantamount to interference? Let us trace this line of thinking to its absurd conclusion. If Trump cannot ask anyone, foreign or domestic, about the obviously dubious behavior of a political rival, then we have created a de facto immunity for anybody running for president, an immunity that extends to their family if they mix family with previous public-office holding. So long as American officials and private citizens misbehave abroad and then run for president, they cannot be investigated legitimately, so this line of thinking goes.

As a historical matter, this would mean that the Benghazi and Clinton Foundation investigations undertaken by Congress were illegitimate the day they began because they had political consequences for presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. They would similarly mean that the Russiagate investigation was wrong the day it began. And while many people can justifiably point to misbehavior by Russiagate investigators, it cannot reasonably be said that Donald Trump’s words, deeds, and associates made that investigation unreasonable from the get-go. Indeed, we can go still further back.

Going back further still, if targeting a political opponent for investigation is illegitimate under any circumstances, then FDR was wrong to direct the FBI to work with friendly European governments to investigate Charles Lindbergh and the German American Bund.

Clearly, creating an effective blanket immunity for those powerful enough to run for president is truly the stuff of banana republics. Indeed, if it achieved anything, it would only encourage well-heeled rascals to run for office while simultaneously encouraging the politically connected to engage in international graft. I, for one, think America has enough of both already.

Finally, I would like to close with two observations. Neither is logically necessary to my argument, but both are sociologically and constitutionally worth examining. Many people are uncomfortable with the president leveraging America’s superior power to extract concessions from an inferior. I question this instinct. Power involves coercion and brokering. It can look and feel gross. It can be smutty. We have two and a half millennia of political philosophy in large part because goodness and political effectiveness have a complicated relationship. People can be bad and ineffective, yes. The good guys sometimes win too. But politics at the highest level has long been recognized as sitting in an awkward relationship to morality.

As a result, politics isn’t for everybody. Though we misattribute the idiom to Bismarck, Americans have long understood that people prefer to eat sausage rather than see it get made. The Framers of the Constitution, who expected to be the weaker party — to be in Zelensky’s position rather than Trump’s — understood this. That’s why Article II, Section 2 gives the president the power to negotiate treaties. Those treaties come into effect only when ratified by the Senate, so the conclusion of a deal is subject to popular review. However, the back-and-forth required to get that deal is and should remain a solely presidential power. If anything, the White House was too quick to disclose the transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky.

None of this guarantees that wrongdoing has not transpired. If President Trump overstepped in the ways outlined above, I will happily revisit my opposition to impeachment. The president is entitled to designate a special representative to serve as his proxy in negotiations or fact-finding, including a personal attorney with whom he enjoys attorney–client privilege over and above traditional executive privilege. However, these powers stop the minute the president directs his subordinate to go beyond information-gathering and to engage in campaigning. And if a subordinate does so of his own volition, that subordinate ought to be punished. However, nothing we have seen to date crosses these lines. Instead, opponents of the president have elevated his person above his position, deciding that the practice of executive power itself is illegitimate because of who has been elected to wield it. That is the very kind of institutional nihilism many of these same people claim to fear most about this presidency.

159

LUKE THOMPSON — Mr. Thompson is a Republican political consultant. @ltthompso
MORE IN WHITE HOUSE
How about a Bipartisan Treaty against the Criminalization of Elections?
Trump Did It, but Should He Be Impeached?
Prince Don
Rudy Giuliani’s Harebrained Scheme
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
The Resistance Failed
CONRAD BLACK
Joe Biden vs. the Democratic Economy Truthers
JOHN HIRSCHAUER
One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders
KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON
Man of Steel
MONA CHAREN
SPONSORED CONTENT
Hate Shaving? Check out This Beauty Find You Can Get at Your Local Drugstore
Hate Shaving? Check out This Beauty…
ELLE.com
Help defenseless animals for 63¢ a…
ASPCA
[Photos] Locals See Wolf Approaching Dog In Park, Then The Unexpected Happens
[Photos] Locals See Wolf Approaching…
PostFun
If You Have an Android, This Star Trek Game is Highly Addictive
If You Have an Android, This Star…
Download Star Trek Fleet Command
Cartoons of the Day: September 26, 2019
Cartoons of the Day: September 26, 2019
Cartoons of the Day: September 26, 2019
The worst places to vacation in America (Stay far away from No. 8)
The worst places to vacation in America (Stay far away from No. 8)
ALOT Travel
Refi your student loans before rates go up.
Refi your student loans before rates go up.
NerdWallet
Does Trump Understand Corruption?
Does Trump Understand Corruption?
Does Trump Understand Corruption?
Tattoo Fails: Try Not To Laugh Hard
Tattoo Fails: Try Not To Laugh Hard
Offbeat
The War-Time Diaries of Miksa Fenyő: A Little-Known Masterpiece
The War-Time Diaries of Miksa Fenyő: A Little-Known Masterpiece
The War-Time Diaries of Miksa Fenyő: A Little-Known Masterpiece
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
Here's What New Dental Implants Should Cost in 2019
Here's What New Dental Implants Should Cost in 2019
realtimeclk.com
Notes from the Class of 1987
Notes from the Class of 1987
Notes from the Class of 1987
Help defenseless animals for 63¢ a day.
ASPCA
PROMOTED POSTS

Johns Hopkins Professor On Child Transgender Trend: ‘Many Regret'
thecollegefix.com

Oberlin College Could Have Paid $1 Instead Of $25 Million In Suit
thecollegefix.com

Student Leaders Fight ‘Heteronormativity’ At Notre Dame
thecollegefix.com

Birds Of Prey Reshoots To Remove Lewd Storyline
boundingintocomics.com
MOST POPULAR

LAW & THE COURTS
Once Again, Progressive Anti-Christian Bigotry Carries a Steep Legal Cost
By DAVID FRENCH

CULTURE
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
By JORDAN SILLARS

VIDEO
Five Cops Were Arrested in Relation to Stormy Daniels’ Arrest

WHITE HOUSE
Trump Did It, but Should He Be Impeached?
By JONAH GOLDBERG

WHITE HOUSE
Why the Impeachment Frenzy May Only Strengthen Trump
By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON

WHITE HOUSE
Prince Don
By KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON

WHITE HOUSE
The Impeachment Train
By YUVAL LEVIN

U.S.
The Radicalism Arms Race
By KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON

WORLD
Double Standards on Ukraine
By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY

WHITE HOUSE
Plurality of Americans Support Impeaching Trump
By ALEXANDRA DESANCTIS

VIEW MORE
LOGIN
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
Sections
The Corner
Bench Memos
The Morning Jolt
The G-File
News
Books, Arts & Manners
All Articles
All Authors
Podcasts
Photos
Games
Videos
Topics
Politics & Policy
Culture
White House
Film & TV
PC Culture
U.S.
World
Immigration
Economy & Business
Elections
Magazine
Latest Issue
Archive
Subscribe
Gve NR as a Gift
Customer Care
NRPLUS
Magazine FAQ
NRPLUS FAQ
About
Frequently Asked Questions
The Masthead
Contact Us
Careers
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
NR Institute
More
Advertise
Donate
Search
E-mails & Alerts
Newsletters

Morning Jolt (M-F)
NR Daily (M-Sa)
Breaking News (M-Su)
Email
© 2019 National Review

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Oh, brother: Schiff admits there was no quid pro pro quo but still believes in impeachment

Oh, Brother: Schiff Admits There Was No Quid Pro Quo But Still Believes In Impeachment
Beth Baumann | Sep 29, 2019 4:15 PM

Oh, Brother: Schiff Admits There Was No Quid Pro Quo But Still Believes In Impeachment
Source: AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) told George Stephanopoulos that his Committee plans to hold President Donald Trump accountable for his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Although the unclassified, unredacted transcript showed that no pro quo took place, Schiff believes impeachment is still necessary. He believes Trump failed to protect America's elections.

"I intend to hold the president accountable and I intend to do it with our own investigation. And what we have seen already is damning because what we have seen in that call record is a president of the United States using the full weight of his office, with a country behold to America for its defense, even as Russian troops occupy part of its land, and the president used that opportunity to try to coerce that leader to manufacture dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election," he said.

"It's hard to imagine a series of facts more damning than that. So yes, we're going to get to the bottom of it."

"Let me stop you right there because we're already hearing some of the president's defenders, even those who sometimes say the call was not appropriate, say yes, that in the absence of an explicit quid pro quo, some kind of statement from the president or a document that says, 'We are withholding the aid until you do that investigation.' That is what is necessary to pursue impeachment," Stephanopoulos said. "That explicit quid pro quo. What's your response to that?"

"Well, that's nonsense," Schiff replied. "It is an illegal, improper violation of oath, a violation of his duty to defend our elections and our Constitution, for the president to merely ask for foreign interference in our elections. That is enough that our president said, 'I want you to do us a favor' and though he added immediately after the Ukraine president talked about the need to get more javelins and more weapons to defend against Russia, so we don't have to show a quid pro quo, although this conversation comes awfully close."

According to Schiff, it's important to note that Trump had the conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "at a time when the president is withholding hundreds of millions of dollars to Ukraine."

"The Ukrainian people and their president are not stupid," Schiff explained. "And neither are the American people. And they can see and understand and appreciate a shakedown when they see it going down and that's exactly what this was."

Adam Schiff
✔
@RepAdamSchiff
We’ll conduct a complete investigation to hold this president accountable.

But what we’ve already seen in his call is damning.

Trump tried to coerce a foreign leader to make up dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election.

Violating his oath and undermining our security.

Embedded video
19.2K
2:00 PM - Sep 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
7,833 people are talking about this
We’ll conduct a complete investigation to hold this president accountable.

But what we’ve already seen in his call is damning.

Trump tried to coerce a foreign leader to make up dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election.

Violating his oath and undermining our security. pic.twitter.com/iHTXPw9zmI

— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) September 29, 2019

Advertisement
Around the Web
Millennials Don't Like These Brands Anymore and They're Struggling
Men, You Don't Need the Blue Pill if You Do This Once Daily
Casinos Don't Expect You to Do This but They Can't Stop You
Little Known Federal Program Pays You $350/monthly To Payout Your Home
Recommended from Townhall

AF Branco Political Cartoons – Political Humor, Jokes, and Pictures Updated Daily ~ September 27, 2019 - 168539

If The Case For Trump’s Impeachment Is So Strong, Why Are Liberals Lying About It?

Bob Gorrell Political Cartoons – Political Humor, Jokes, and Pictures Updated Daily ~ September 24, 2019 - 168433

Geraldo Rivera Has An Idea Of Whose 'Dirty Hands' Are Behind Whistleblower Complaint

Political Cartoons - Political Humor, Jokes and Pictures

Do Niro still an expert at curse words and ad hominem attacks. Actual salient points... Not so much

NEWS SEPTEMBER 29, 2019
'F**k em': Robert De Niro unleashes expletive-filled rant against Trump-supporting Fox News critics
'This guy is crazy. We gotta get him out'
Image source: YouTube screenshot
CHRIS ENLOE
Legendary actor Robert De Niro had a harsh words Sunday for Trump-supporting critics on Fox News.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
"F**k em, f**k em," De Niro said on CNN's "Reliable Sources."

De Niro's comments came in response to host Brian Stelter, who asked De Niro why he has decided to engage in vulgar language when criticizing the president.

The CNN host then asked his question again after reminding De Niro his comments did not violate FCC rules.

"We are in a moment in our lives in this country where this guy is like a gangster. He's come along, and he's said things, done things. We say over and over again, 'This is terrible, we're in a terrible situation, we're in a terrible situation.' And this guy just keeps going on and on and on without being stopped," De Niro said.

Earlier in the interview, De Niro called Trump "crazy."

"This guy is crazy. We gotta get him out," De Niro said. "He's been worse than I ever could have imagined."

Daily News Highlights
Get the news that matters most delivered directly to your inbox.
Your email
GET IMPORTANT NEWS

No whistleblower, just a leaker, US in cold civil war

×
Rush Limbaugh
For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Download
Now
THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW MAIN MENU

There Is No Whistleblower, Just a Leaker! We’re in the Midst of a Cold Civil War
Sep 27, 2019

RUSH: There really is no whistleblower. This is just a leaker who followed procedures that have been established to give whistleblowers protection.

The whole thing is a sham. It’s nothing more than the Steele dossier 2.0, as I have been saying all week. A couple people now have come to this conclusion. It’s the same people, it’s the same scam, it’s the same objective, and I’m gonna add a name to potential Democrat presidential nominees coming up soon.

JOHNNY DONOVAN: And now, from sunny South Florida, it’s Open Line Friday!

RUSH: Bottom line, there isn’t anything really new here. This is just the next phase of “Get Trump.” This is the next phase of the operation to overturn the election results of 2016. It’s the same players, it’s the same technique, it’s the same play. The whistleblower report, it was probably prepared with the assistance of House Intelligence Committee staffers.

Nothing about this is genuine. There’s no real whistleblower who’s terribly alarmed and upset over what Trump said in a phone call. The whistleblower didn’t even hear it. It’s just the next phase. It’s the same play run to the different side of the line. Let’s put it that way. And the whistleblower report is the Steele dossier all over again. Some people think that it is the same technique with Christine Blasey Ford. But that whole thing was an extension of the original play.

What is this really all about? What is this really, really all about? It’s all about overturning the election results of 2016. Why is that so important? It goes beyond just the fact that the deep state lost. I think what it’s about is what I have long thought it’s about. It’s about making sure the American people do not learn the extent of the corruption in the Obama administration and the Democrat Party at large, and particularly among these people in the deep state who did what they did to deny Trump his election victory.

And that’s why Pelosi’s out there today saying that Bill Barr has gone rogue. If you need any evidence that they scared to death of what Barr and his team are investigating as to the origins of all of this, Pelosi out of the blue saying that Barr has gone rogue, they are doing everything they can to destroy everybody on the other side of this.

There’s nothing that’s true. You know what really is hard about this is that we’re dealing with nothing but a series of abject lies. Everybody on the left is lying. Every allegation about this is a lie. Trump hasn’t broken any laws. Trump has not engaged in any corruption. In fact, Trump is the most investigated president in the history of the country, and they still haven’t found a crime! They’re still looking for a crime. They haven’t found a crime, so they’re making things up.

The media is not media. It’s just Democrats who work in the media, and the whole group of ’em is aligned. And what we are in the middle of now, folks, is a Cold Civil War. It has begun. It is a Cold Civil War as opposed to hot. There’s no hostilities declared. There’s no two clear sides of this. And certainly no shots have been fired. But nevertheless we’re in the midst of a Cold Civil War, and it encompasses a lot of things.

It encompasses overturn the election results of 2016, it is about protecting and defending the deep state, the Washington establishment going forward. Their careers, their fortunes, their corruption. There are terribly big stakes involved here for these people. And Trump is on the cusp of overturning it and exposing it. They cannot allow that to happen.

Now, I’ve had a number of people mention this to me as well, so this is not an original thought of mine. But as I’ve thought about it, it makes perfect sense.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: On this whistleblower story, there isn’t a whistleblower! Just like there wasn’t a dossier. Not a real one. It was manufactured political opposition research. This whistleblower report is manufactured political opposition research. The lies are impossible to keep up with. Eric Swalwell was on Fox this morning saying, “Well, the president’s confessed.”

Confessed? What’s the president confessed to?

“Well, he’s confessed to trying to hide the information in the whistleblower report!”

The president hasn’t confessed. What did Adam Schiff do yesterday? Adam Schiff goes up as the chairman of the committee and says that the president called the president of Ukraine and ordered him, “Dig up dirt, lots of it — and don’t call me back until you get it — on Joe Biden.” That didn’t happen. Trump hasn’t done anything they are accusing him of doing. Swalwell, after saying that Trump had confessed, then pointed out that, “Well, look what Trump did. Trump took the transcript of the phone call and he put it over here in this secure area.

“He’s clearly hiding it. That’s a political move. The president’s ashamed. It’s the same as confessing that he’s guilty. We must move forward with impeachment.” There’s no confession! Trump has confessed to nothing. Trump hasn’t done anything! Trump has committed no impeachable offense. He has committed no illegal act. They didn’t find a single thing! Yet they lie through their teeth. This sequestering of the transcript of the call into a private, secure area? Let’s call it “the secure enclave” just to be different. Do you know they’ve been doing that for two years?

It’s not tied to this transcript. It has nothing to do with this call. And do you know why transcripts and other records of presidential conversations involving Trump are sent over to the secure enclave? Because they’ve got a leak problem! Because they’ve got some deep state, administrative state traitors in there who were opposed to Trump, who are leaking like sieves, and so they’re sequestering this stuff for the sake of national security!

They’re not hiding it for political reasons! They’re trying to protect it! They’re trying to protect the integrity of presidential conversations and everything that they entail. But here’s Eric Swalwell today lying through his teeth saying, “Trump has confessed.” “The attorney general, Bill Barr, has gone rogue. We must speed up the impeachment process.” There is no whistleblower. There was no legitimate Steele dossier.

All we have is a deep state leaker probably related in some way to John Brennan. The New York Times already outed the guy as a disgruntled CIA person, and the guy simply leaks a bunch of stuff, has his report written with the assistance of staffers on the Democrat side on the House Intelligence Committee, and calls himself a “whistleblower” for the protections that it offers! You watch. Every other future leak of major consequence like this is all of a sudden gonna be called “whistleblower” because of the statutory protections that are granted to whistleblowers.

I can’t emphasize enough that there isn’t anything real about any of this like there wasn’t anything real in Trump-Russia collusion. Let me clarify. There was a lot real in Trump-Russia collusion, but it was all the things committed by Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Obama, McCabe, Strzok Smirk, and that whole cast of characters. That was real. That effort to undermine Trump — to spy on Trump, to get the election result overturned — all of that stuff was real.

The things they were alleging Trump did, none of it happened. They’re still lying about the Mueller report. Democrats are out there saying the Mueller report proves that Trump colluded, 16 different times now. No, it doesn’t. It doesn’t say that at all. The Mueller report concludes that there wasn’t any collusion between Trump and Russia. But the Mueller report was written as a pre-impeachment document anyway. The Mueller report was written to be used as it is.

It was written with all the footnotes and the careful sentence structure to be able to be cited the way the Democrats are citing it. “Robert Mueller found collusion 16 different times!” No, he didn’t. “Well, right there it is: The president probably… The president might have this and that… Somebody here said…” It’s nothing but hearsay. There’s nothing. But the sheer power of the ruling class is what is on display here, and their literal panic and fright over having it all upended.

Related Links
RushLimbaugh.com: Democrats in Media and Democrats in Politics Collude to Create Another Fake Scandal! - 09.26.19
The Federalist: Complaint From So-Called ‘Whistleblower’ Is Riddled With Gossip, Blatant Falsehoods - Sean Davis
HotAir: Pro Tip From Pelosi: Barr’s Gone Rogue
Washington Examiner: 2020 Race Flip: Trump 47%, Biden 43%
ARCHIVES CALENDAR

Judicial watch Sue's for documents on Biden forcing firing of Ukrainian prosecutor

SUBSCRIBE
2 Comments
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden greets guests at the Polk County Democrats' Steak Fry on Sept. 21, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden greets guests at the Polk County Democrats' Steak Fry on Sept. 21, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)MORE
POLITICS
Judicial Watch Sues for Documents on Biden Forcing Firing of Ukraine Prosecutor
BY MARK TAPSCOTT
September 26, 2019 Updated: September 26, 2019
WASHINGTON—Judicial Watch announced Sept. 26 that it has filed suit in federal court seeking to force the State Department to release all official U.S. government documents related to the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor, as demanded by former Vice President Joe Biden.

ADVERTISING

The nonprofit government watchdog’s suit was in response to the government’s failure to respond to a May 7 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for:

Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to Viktor Shokin’s investigation of Mykola Zolchevsky, and Shokin’s resignation at Ukraine’s Prosecutor General.
Any and all records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the Department of State and any official, employee, or representative of the Office of the Vice President regarding Shokin.
Postal records confirmed that the Office of Programs and Information Services, which handles FOIA requests sent to the State Department, received the Judicial Watch request. The department didn’t respond within the time limits set by federal law, according to Judicial Watch.

The FOIA was filed after a video became public of Biden telling a Jan. 23, 2018, conference at the Council on Foreign Relations of his threatening to withhold more than $1 billion in U.S. assistance to the government of Ukraine if officials didn’t fire Shokin before Biden departed the country in six hours.

Shokin was at the time conducting a corruption investigation of Burisma, a Ukraine energy company that was paying Biden’s son, Hunter, $50,000 a month in consulting fees, according to media reports.

“I remember going over and convincing our team that we should be providing loan guarantees, and I went over to Kyiv for, I guess, the 12th or 13th time, and I was supposed to announce there was another $1 billion loan guarantee,” Biden told the conference.

“And I had gotten a commitment from [then-Ukraine President Petro] Poroshenko and [then-Ukraine Prime Minister Arseniy] Yatsenyuk that they would take action against [Shokin], and they didn’t.

“So they were walking out to the press conference, and I said, ‘We’re not gonna give you the billion dollars.’ They said, ‘You have no authority, you’re not the president.’ The president said, I said, ‘Call him.’

“I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars, and I’m leaving here, I believe, in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’

“Well, son of a …, the prosecutor got fired.”

The Judicial Watch lawsuit for the Biden records was announced the same day as acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire testified before the House Select Committee on Intelligence concerning his handling of a complaint filed by an anonymous federal worker described by the news media as a “whistleblower.”

The complaint was given to the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (IGIC). It claimed President Donald Trump threatened in a July 25 telephone call to cut off U.S. military assistance if Ukraine’s then-newly elected President Volodymyr Zelensky didn’t reopen the investigation of Burisma and Hunter Biden. The complaint also claimed White House aides tried to hide call records.

Trump released the official transcript of the call Sept. 25, calling it “a nothing call,” and denying any wrongdoing in the conversation with Zelensky.

Maguire received the complaint from the IGIC, concluded it was “credible,” and gave it to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel reviewed it and concluded the allegations in the complaint failed to meet the legal definition of an “urgent concern” in the federal whistleblower protection statute and warranted no further action.

The unidentified individual who filed the complaint acknowledged that he or she did not actually hear the president’s call to Zelensky, but only learned about it secondhand from half-a-dozen White House officials. The IGIC also said there were “indicia of an arguable political bias” against Trump in the complaint.

Congressional Democrats insist Trump’s alleged threat is an impeachable crime and are moving forward with multiple investigations they claim will determine whether formal articles of impeachment should be filed in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the ranking minority member of the intelligence panel, told the Maguire hearing, “What we have with this storyline is another Steele dossier. … In the Democrats’ mania to overturn the 2016 elections, everything they touch gets hopelessly politicized.”

The Steele dossier is the discredited document that was investigated in the two-year probe, which found no Trump/Russia collusion. The dossier had been paid for by Trump’s 2016 opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

Contact Mark Tapscott at mark.tapscott@epochtimes.nyc

Share
RECOMMENDED

LANGUAGES
English
Chinese
Spanish
Hebrew
Japanese
Korean
Indonesian
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Swedish
Dutch
Russian
Ukrainian
Romanian
Czech
Slovak
Polish
Turkish
Persian
Subscribe Advertise About Us Contact Us RSS Feeds Terms of Services Privacy Policy Copyright Policy
@ COPYRIGHT 2000 - 2019

Impeachment is treasonous communist coup attempt

Trump News
Search
Search
‘Impeachment’ is nothing less than a full-scale Communist coup attempt by treasonous Democrats who long ago sold out America and the American people for Globalism
09/27/2019 / By News Editors

In an excellent new story over at CD Media titled “If You Were The Dem Organized Crime Family And About To Be Prosecuted For An Illegal Coup, What Would You Do?” that Whatfinger News had linked to on Wednesday, author L. Todd Wood, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy who flew special operations helicopters supporting SEAL Team 6 and Delta Force, argues that criminal Democrats and their enablers within the mainstream media know what is coming and, desperate beyond words, their doomed-to-fail impeachment attempt of President Trump might be the only way to get them out of the huge mess that they are in.

(Article by Stefan Stanford republished from AllNewsPipeline.com)

With Susan Duclos reporting in this story on ANP on Wednesday that ‘the beginning of the end‘ talk being babbled about by Democrats again in their drive to take down President Trump echoes that which they’ve been babbling on now about for nearly 3 years since President Trump took office, even House Democrat Jeff Van Drew knows that “at the end of the day, all we’re going to have is a failed impeachment“.

Yet as Tom Luongo so perfectly points out in this new story republished at Zero Hedge titled “The Coup Has Begun – The Empire Strikes Back Everywhere“, there are no coincidences in politics. Everything happens on a particular schedule. So when I see a day as crazy as today I have to ask the question, “Why this, why now?”

And as we see in his story, what’s happening politically is by no means just regional here in America – it’s happening all around the world, helping to prove the ‘global nature‘ of ‘globalism‘ and the fact that the globalists are ‘digging in‘ at a time when President Trump just ‘blistered‘ socialism and globalism at the United Nations. From Luongo’s story.:

Look at the headlines and you’ll see what I’m talking about. All of these things happened since I woke up at 7:30am Monday morning in Florida:

The British Supreme Court just arrogated unprecedented power to itself by inserting itself into any dispute between the Government and Parliament. This upends more than 300 years of constitutional process.

The Democrats have announced they will pursue impeachment charges against President Trump because an unverified, hearsay whistleblower made a complaint about a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenski. Impeachment odds soared overnight as someone was tipped off about the Democrats’ plan.

Bitcoin’s hashrate mysteriously flash-crashed more than 40% presaging a massive $1500 drop in price.

Donald Trump delivered a blistering critique of socialism at the United Nations General Assembly. Too bad he’s nearly as bad as the ones he’s fighting on the far left.

Europe’s Trio of Faded Glory — The UK, France and Germany — joined in the chorus of unverified condemnation of Iran in the attack on the Saudi oil field on the 14th.

The Federal Reserve continues to bail out banks to the tune of $65 to $75 billion per day through overnight repo operations that no one can give us an explanation as to why they’re needed.

This feels to me like a multi-level coup against those that dare stand athwart the global power structure. Both British and American leadership institutions are under sincere attack with these moves.

As we’ll explore in the rest of this ANP story, with everything else that we’ve been watching unfolding in America over the past decade+, one could easily argue that what we’ve been witnessing over the past several years since President Trump was voted into office has been a full-scale Communist coup attempt with Democrats and globalists never, ever believing that Hillary Clinton would lose in 2016 and their beliefs they’d be ‘protected’ from their crimes of treason and completely selling out America and the American people forever.

As ‘Doomer Doug‘ reported in this recent story titled “If Treason Prosper, Then None Dare Call It Treason“, the final gasps of the attempted ‘coup d’etat‘ to remove President Trump are now underway with Doug warning in his story that the end results of this could be complete chaos and anarchy in America, potentially leading to Civil War with Democrats insanely still believing they can do no wrong while attempting to overthrow the results of the US election for more than 2 years running now with the ‘coup attempt‘ led by people such as Communist-voting John Brennan.

Magic path current challenge: visual illusion with shadows

We have the ability to see pure energy - light, without attaching almost no value to it. There are a lot of illusions associated with light, many of which are able to amaze if we turn off the usual flow of interpretations. Today every time looking at an object in the shadow, imagine that this is its color, not the shadow. He pointed to a long boulder standing directly in front of us. "Look at the shadow of that boulder, "He said. "The shadow is the boulder, and yet it isn't. To observe the boulder in order to know what the boulder is, is doing, but to observe its shadow is not-doing. "Shadows are like doors, the doors of not-doing. A man of knowledge, for example, can tell the innermost feelings of men by watching their shadows." "Is there movement in them?" I asked. "You may say that there is movement in them, or you may say that the lines of the world are shown in them, or you may say that feelings come from them." "But how could feelings come out of shadows, don Juan?" "To believe that shadows are just shadows is doing" he explained. "That belief is somehow stupid. Think about it this way: There is so much more to everything in the world that obviously there must be more to shadows too. After all, what makes them shadows is merely our doing." C.Castaneda "Journey to Ixtlan" Type: stopping the internal dialogue, not doing Difficulty: low

A course in miracles day 26

Lesson 26
My attack thoughts are attacking my invulnerability.
1 It is surely obvious that if you can be attacked, you are not invulnerable. You see attack as a real threat. That is because you believe that you can really attack. And what would have effects through you must also have effects on you. It is this law that will ultimately save you. But you are misusing it now. You must therefore learn how it can be used for your own best interests rather than against them.

2 Because your attack thoughts will be projected, you will fear attack. And if you fear attack, you must believe that you are not invulnerable. Attack thoughts therefore make you vulnerable in your own mind, which is where the attack thoughts are. Attack thoughts and invulnerability cannot be accepted together. They contradict each other.

3 The idea for today introduces the thought that you always attack yourself. If attack thoughts must entail the belief that you are vulnerable, their effect is to weaken you in your own eyes. Thus they have attacked your perception of yourself. And because you believe in them, you can no longer believe in yourself. A false image of yourself has come to take the place of what you are.

4 Practice with today's idea will help you to understand that vulnerability or invulnerability is the result of your own thoughts. Nothing except your thoughts can attack you. Nothing except your thoughts can make you think you are vulnerable. And nothing except your thoughts can prove to you this is not so.

5 Six practice periods are required in applying today's idea. A full two minutes should be attempted for each of them, although the time may be reduced to a minute if the discomfort is too great. Do not reduce it further.

6 The practice period should begin with repeating the idea for today, then closing your eyes and reviewing the unresolved situations whose outcomes are causing you concern. The concern may take the form of depression, worry, anger, a sense of imposition, fear, foreboding, or preoccupation. Any problem as yet unsettled which tends to recur in your thoughts during the day is a suitable subject. You will not be able to use very many for any one practice period, because a longer time than usual should be spent with each one. Today's idea should be applied as follows:

7 First, name the situation:

8 I am concerned about ______.

9 Then go over every possible outcome which has occurred to you in that connection and which has caused you concern, referring to each one quite specifically, saying:

10 I am afraid ______ will happen.

11 If you are doing the exercises properly, you should have some five or six distressing possibilities available for each situation you use and quite possibly more. It is much more helpful to cover a few situations thoroughly than to touch on a larger number.

12 As the list of anticipated outcomes for each situation continues, you will probably find some of them, especially those which occur to you toward the end, less acceptable to you. Try, however, to treat them all alike to whatever extent you can.

13 After you have named each outcome of which you are afraid, tell yourself:

14 That thought is an attack upon myself.

15 Conclude each practice period by repeating today's idea once more.

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Joker Movie Exposes SJW Hypocrisy

Joker Movie Exposes SJW Hypocrisy

https://batmanparodyhub.blogspot.com

The Fans Are Winning - George Lucas Hates Disney's Star Wars!

The Fans Are Winning - George Lucas Hates Disney's Star Wars!

http://starwarsparodyhub.blogspot.com

Kathleen Kennedy Betrayed George Lucas and Ruined Star Wars

Kathleen Kennedy Betrayed George Lucas and Ruined Star Wars

http://starwarsparodyhub.blogspot.com

Trump slams impeachment scam and touts admin achievements

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 3:20 PM PT – Sat. September 28, 2019
President Trump is doubling down on his phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, and slams ongoing impeachment efforts by the Left.President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the InterContinental Barclay New York hotel during the United Nations General Assembly, Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019, in New York. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)In a pair of tweets Saturday evening, the president questions how the U.S. would impeach a leader, who has created the greatest economy in the history of the U.S. and rebuilt the nation’s military.He also touts the tax cuts and jobs act, as well as fixing the department of Veterans affairs.In a follow up tweet, President Trump said, Volodymyr Zelenskiy told the media he wasn’t pressured to investigate the Biden family, in any way shape or form.President Trump also said, his Ukrainian counterpart’s dismissal of the allegations should bring an end to the latest witch hunt, adding that the others “ended in ashes.”

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
· 4h
How do you impeach a President who has created the greatest Economy in the history of our Country, entirely rebuilt our Military into the most powerful it has ever been, Cut Record Taxes & Regulations, fixed the VA & gotten Choice for our Vets (after 45 years), & so much more?...

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
....The conversation with the new and very good Ukraine President, who told the Fake News, at the United Nations, that HE WAS NOT PRESSURED BY ME IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, should by and of itself bring an end to the new and most recent Witch Hunt. Others ended in ashes!

38.7K
6:00 PM - Sep 28, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
16.9K people are talking about this

Ruby Rose Attacks Men Because Everyone Hates Batwoman

Meet Their New Leader!

Meet Their New Leader!

Debunking Potholer54 and Global Warming/Climate Change Propaganda:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/02/debunking-potholer54-and-global.html

Warren Financially Benefited from Private Prisons Despite Claiming They Are ‘Profiteering off Cruelty’

Warren Financially Benefited from Private Prisons Despite Claiming They Are ‘Profiteering off Cruelty’ Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) benefited financially from the existence of private prisons despite vowing to ban them on the grounds that they are “profiteering off cruelty,” a report from the Washington Free Beacon revealed. Breitbart

https://pocahontas2020.blogspot.com/

9/11 BOMBSHELL CNBC News Anchor Ron Insana WTC-7 Brought Down by Controlled Implosion

9/11 BOMBSHELL CNBC News Anchor Ron Insana WTC-7 Brought Down by Controlled Implosion

Related:

Ph.D. Structural Engineer: “$10,000 to Anyone Who Can Refute New University of Alaska WTC-7 Study”:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/phd-structural-engineer-10000-to-anyone.html

@gerrycan1 debunks debunker Mick West's 2019 WTC 7 study analysis:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/gerrycan1-debunks-debunker-mick-west.html

Are there more problems with the UAF/Hulsey/AE911Truth WTC7 Draft Report or the NIST WTC 7 Report? You Decide...

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/are-there-more-problems-with.html

Giuliani to testify before House regarding BIDEN'S Ukrainian scandal

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 8:50 AM PT – Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
President Trump’s personal attorney says he is willing to testify before Congress about the Ukraine scandal.Congressional Democrats called for Rudy Giuliani’s testimony this week, amid reports he pushed the Ukrainian government to reopen its corruption probe into Joe Biden’s son Hunter.Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani speaks at a rally supporting a regime change in Iran outside United Nations headquarters on the first day of the general debate at the U.N. General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019, in New York. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)This after information in the recent whistleblower complaint emerged, mentioning attempts by Giuliani’s associates to reach out to the current Ukrainian president’s team.In an interview on Friday, Giuliani said the move was perfectly legal, and that he has nothing to hide.“Would I like to testify and tell my story? Sure. I’ve been telling it. All the time. In fact, you know my story,” said Giuliani. “There’s nothing I can tell them that you can’t read online. From the very beginning, I’ve been totally transparent about this.”Giuliani reiterated that the whistleblower complaint can not be trusted because it was based solely on second hand information.

A course in miracles day 25

Lesson 25
I do not know what anything is for.
1 Purpose is meaning. Today's idea explains why nothing you see means anything. You do not know what it is for. Therefore it is meaningless to you. Everything is for your own best interests. That is what it is for; that is its purpose; that is what it means. It is in recognizing this that your goals become unified. It is in recognizing this that what you see is given meaning.

2 You perceive the world and everything in it as meaningful in terms of ego goals. These goals have nothing to do with your own best interests because the ego is not you. This false identification makes you incapable of understanding what anything is for. As a result, you are bound to misuse it. When you believe this, you will try to withdraw the goals you have assigned to the world instead of attempting to reinforce them.

3 Another way of describing the goals you now perceive as valuable is to say that they are all concerned with "personal" interests. Since you have no personal interests, your goals are really concerned with nothing. In cherishing them, therefore, you have no goals at all. And thus you do not know what anything is for.

4 Before you can make any sense out of the exercises for today, one more thought is necessary. At the most superficial levels, you do recognize purpose. Yet purpose cannot be understood at these levels. For example, you do understand that a telephone is for the purpose of talking to someone who is not physically in your immediate vicinity. What you do not understand is what you want to reach him for. And it is this that makes your contact with him meaningful or not.

5 It is crucial to your learning to be willing to give up the goals you have established for everything. The recognition that they are meaningless, rather than "good" or "bad," is the only way to accomplish this. The idea for today is a step in this direction.

6 Six practice periods, each of two minutes duration, are required. Each practice period should begin with a slow repetition of the idea for today followed by looking about you and letting your glance rest on whatever happens to catch your eye, near or far, "important" or "unimportant," "human" or "unhuman." With your eyes resting on each subject you so select, say, for example:

7 I do not know what this chair is for.
I do not know what this pencil is for.
I do not know what this hand is for.

8 Say this quite slowly, without shifting your eyes until you have completed the statement. Then move on to the next subject, and apply today's idea as before.

Friday, September 27, 2019

Being transgender is bad for your health

Skip to content
Alex Jones' InfoWars
THE ALEX JONES RADIO SHOW
LISTEN NOWWATCH NOW

FDA: OVER 6,000 DEAD FROM PUBERTY BLOCKING DRUG FOR TRANSGENDER CHILDREN
Parents of kids with gender dysphoria not warned about dangers of hormone blockers
Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 0 Comments
FDA: Over 6,000 Dead From Puberty Blocking Drug For Transgender Children
A drug used to block puberty in children with gender dysphoria is responsible for the death of over 6,300 people, according to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA).

The Christian Post reports Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron) “is being prescribed off-label for use in children who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria despite the lack of formal FDA approval for that purpose.”

“The drug is clinically approved for treatment of precocious puberty, a condition where children start their pubertal processes at an abnormally early age and the blocker is administered for a short time until the proper age,” the outlet continues.

Citing FDA data, the article reads, “Between 2012 and June 30 of this year, the FDA documented over 40,764 adverse reactions suffered by patients who took Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron), which is used as a hormone blocker. More than 25,500 reactions logged from 2014-2019 were considered ‘serious,’ including 6,370 deaths.”

A California-based endocrinologist named Michael Laidlaw has been exposing the controversial tactic of prescribing testosterone to girls as young as 8 who suffer from gender dysphoria.

Laidlaw argues, “Gender dysphoria is not an endocrine condition, but is a psychological one and should, therefore, be treated with proper psychological care.”

However, when puberty blockers are given to children, an endocrine condition is created.

This dangerous practice is becoming increasingly lucrative for Big Pharma company AbbVie, with Lupron sales in the United States hitting $669 million in 2017.

WATCH LIVE

RELATED ARTICLES
Report: Hundreds of Documents Conflict with Joe Biden’s Account of Why Ukrainian Prosecutor Was Fired
REPORT: HUNDREDS OF DOCUMENTS CONFLICT WITH JOE BIDEN’S ACCOUNT OF WHY UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR WAS FIRED
U.S. NEWS
Comments
Understanding The Impeachment Charade
UNDERSTANDING THE IMPEACHMENT CHARADE
U.S. NEWS
Comments
SCHIFF’S ‘RE-TELLING’ OF TRUMP PHONE CALL WITH UKRAINE HEAD GETS MOCKED AS ‘UNHINGED ORANGE-MAN-BAD FAN FICTION’
U.S. NEWS
comments
REPORT: TRUMP UPSET WITH KUSHNER’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM, THINKS IT’S A ‘POLITICAL LOSER’ AND ‘TOTAL DUD’
U.S. NEWS
comments
SHOCK AND AWE: DEMOCRATS ARE RUSHING TO HAVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT READY FOR A VOTE AROUND THANKSGIVING
U.S. NEWS
comments
COMMENTS

SEARCH
Search for articles

LATEST STORIES
Big Tech Purging Latinos Who Support Trump – Watch Fire Power With Will Johnson NOW
Video: Trump Says We Are “At War”
Jon Voight Says Dems Waging ‘War on Truth’: ‘Stand Strong with President Trump’ Against Impeachment
Real Stable Genius: Today We Salute You Mr. Climate Change Activist!
Watch: Greta Thunberg Crumbles Without Script When Asked Simple Questions by Reporter
Pro-Abortion Group Bestows Hillary Clinton With Lifetime Achievement Award
GET INFORMED
Get the latest breaking news & specials from Alex Jones and the Infowars crew.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
hello world
VISIT OUR STORESHOP HERE
ULTRA 12
Your Price: $49.95
On Sale: $24.95
A powerful B12 formula fueled by the premium source of B12 - methylcobalamin - for TWICE the B12!

BUY NOW

LEARN MORE
ILLUSTRATION

Next
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
POLLS
With Democrats announcing new impeachment inquiry, what will Congress ultimately do to Trump?

Impeach
Impeach and remove
Nothing
View Results

Radio
Video
NewsWars
PPTV
Store
Infowars Life
T.O.S.
Archive
Advertise
Watch Alex Jones Show
Most Recent
D.M.C.A.
Corrections
About Alex Jones Show
Subscribe
Contact

RADIO SHOW▼
NEWS▼
VIDEOS▼
STORE
BREAKING NEWS
CONTACT▼
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE

Military suicides highest rate ever

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 6:35 AM PT — Friday, September 27, 2019
The suicide rate for active duty military members has reached a record high, and Pentagon officials are trying to grapple with the tragedies that are ticking upward. That’s according to a recent report from the Defense Department, which revealed suicides have been rising at an average of six-percent annually over the past five years.Most recently, the number of service members who took their own life jumped from 285 to 325 between 2017 and 2018. The Pentagon report applies to service members in the Army, Navy and Marine Corps.Military leaders say getting down to the root of the issue is difficult as they struggle to identify members with possible problems since some might be reluctant to seek help for fear it could affect promotions or security clearances.Several months ago, members of Congress talked with specialists about how to deal with issues veterans might grapple with after serving.“Many of them do not use veteran as there primary identity and so, that is why it’s really critically important that we embed these strategies in the U.S. health care system. So that no matter where a veteran goes for care, they will be greeted with a health care professional who’s been appropriately trained, equipped, and incentivized to do the right thing.” — Terri Tanielian, Sr. Behavioral Scientist – Rand CorporationFILE – In this Sept. 6, 2019, file photo, U.S. soldiers survey the the safe zone between Syria and the Turkish border near Tal Abyad, Syria, on a joint patrol with the Tax Abyad Military Council, affiliated with the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo, File)Following the new report, however, leaders at the Pentagon worry the military environment invites many stressors that make it sometimes almost impossible to identify root causes.Earlier this year, the president signed an executive order to help curb the suicide rate among veterans. The task force pulls federal governments, local governments and private sector partners together to find solutions to curb the tragedies.“They leave a military life and go to civilian life, and it is different. We must keep our promises to those who keep us free. Through today’s action I am launching the prevent initiative. The president’s road map to empower veterans and end the national tragedy of suicide.” — President TrumpMilitary officials say the number of suicides for the Air Force have slowed down, but they say they are still working on many initiatives such as an interactive education program to help members develop coping skills.
If you or anyone you know may be contemplating suicide please call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 for help.

Warren flustered after being asked about ethics plan

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., talks about her plans if she becomes president during a rally at Keene State College, in Keene, N.H., on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019. (Kristopher Radder/The Brattleboro Reformer via AP)
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:35 AM PT — Friday, September 27, 2019
2020 Democrat presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren appeared flustered on the campaign trail after a reporter asked her about her ethics plan. Warren spoke with reporters at a campaign event in New Hampshire this week, where someone asked if her plan “would allow her vice president’s son to serve on the board of a foreign company.”The question comes amid a shift in media focus to fellow 2020 candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who worked for a Ukrainian oil and gas company while his father was serving as vice president.Warren initially responded to the question saying she would not allow her vice president’s son to work for a foreign company, but she quickly backtracked.

Nicole Sganga
✔
@NicoleSganga
· Sep 25, 2019
Replying to @NicoleSganga
WARREN: “It’s not a matter of politics, it’s a matter of constitutionality. Nobody‘s above the law, not even the President of the United States... If Congress does not hold this man accountable, he will break the law again & again. It‘s time for impeachment now.” #nhpolitics

View image on Twitter

Nicole Sganga
✔
@NicoleSganga
FLAG: Senator Elizabeth Warren appears uncharacteristically flustered when asked if her ethics plan would allow her Vice President's son to serve on the board of a foreign company: "No," she said. "I don't know. I mean I’d have to go back and look at the details." #nhpolitics

Embedded video
7,369
7:38 PM - Sep 25, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
5,129 people are talking about this
Warren said in her plan she will “categorically ban the practice of private lobbying for foreign governments, foreign individuals and foreign companies.”

Magic path current challenge: phone usage

During the day observe how much time you spend on the phone. Various applications that measure productivity, such as UBhind or QualityTime, can help. At the end of the day check to see if the results match the ones you expected. He pointed at the mountain range east of the small valley where the town is located. "There is enough glitter in those mountains to jolt your assemblage point,” he said to me. "Just before the sun goes down behind the western peaks, you will have a few moments to catch all the glitter you need. The magic key that opens the earth’s doors is made of internal silence plus anything that shines.” "What exactly should I do, don Juan?” I asked. Both of them examined me. I thought I saw in their eyes a mixture of curiosity and revulsion. "Just cut off the internal dialogue,” don Juan said to me. C.Castaneda "The Fire From Within" Type: stopping the internal dialogue, saving energy Difficulty: low

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Former CIA analyst says CIA whistleblower is blowing smoke

More Accurate than The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC for Two Years and Counting!
Grand Opening of The Gateway Pundit Store — Click Here

Larry C. Johnson: The Deep State ‘Whistleblower’ Blows Smoke
Jim Hoft by Jim Hoft September 26, 2019 56 Comments
42Share33TweetEmail
Guest post by Larry C. Johnson

Now that we have seen the whistleblower complaint filed by a CIA officer against President Trump, there should be little doubt that it is a fraud and represents an abuse of the whistleblower process. I know genuine whistleblowers (e.g., Bill Binney, Kirk Wiebe, Ed Loomis, Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou, etc.) and have been one myself. I am familiar with the kind of information one must possess (or should possess) in order to initiate a complaint. This complaint does not even meet the stupid standard. It is a trumped up complaint.

This CIA officer who filed the complaint has no direct evidence or knowledge. He heard things from other people. He was not party to the phone conversation and did not have access to the transcript. Instead, he cited public media as “corroboration” for his allegations, including reports by John Solomon.

The whistleblower is supposedly an analyst. Pray to God he is not. If this is an example of this clown’s analytical chops then we now know what the CIA has been on the downward slide. Rather than focus on evidence and facts, this guy relied on rumor.

The egregious conduct of the whistleblower is exceeded by the incompetence of the Intelligence Community Inspector General. When the complaint was filed a competent professional IG would have dismissed it immediately because it was based on hearsay. If we follow his logic, every single Presidential conversation with a foreign leader that involves discussion of a policy or issue an analyst does not support could/should become an IG investigation. That is not an intelligence function no matter how sincerely or fiercely the complainant believes their beef merits attention.

It would appear that the Democrats who plotted with this CIA officer were counting on Donald Trump to claim executive privilege on his conversation with Ukrainian President Zelensky and, based on the same privilege, withhold the whistleblower complaint.

Whoops!! Trump did not play ball. He preempted the Democrat Kabuki theater by releasing the relevant documents and transcripts President Trump pre-empted the ability of the Democrats to accuse him of illegal acts by citing his refusal to turnover documents.

How can anyone claiming whistleblower status be allowed to file a complaint on something about which they have no direct knowledge? The entire premise of the intelligence community is the access to reliable sources, i.e., people who have direct knowledge of what they are reporting on. The Dems are in a state of flacid erectus.

To appreciate the lies of the so-called Whistleblower, let us compare his claims with what actually transpired:

The Whistleblower Claims:

The President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals.

What President Trump Actually Said:

I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible. . . .

The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me.

COMMENT–At no time did President Trump say anything about the 2020 election or the need to do something to Biden to preempt his ability to run for the Democrat nomination. Trump’s request was specifically about what happened in light of Joe Biden’s public claim–I REPEAT, PUBLIC CLAIM–that he used the threat of withholding aid from Ukraine unless they fired the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the company that hired Joe’s cocaine head son, Hunter.

The Whistleblower Claims:

Multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me that, after an initial exchange of pleasantries, the President used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests. Namely, he sought to pressure the Ukrainian leader to take actions to help the President’s 2020 reelection bid:

• initiate or continue an investigation2 into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden;

• assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 20 I 6 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm Crowdstrike,3 which initially reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the DNC’s networks in 2016; and

• meet or speak with two people the President named explicitly as his personal envoys on these matters, Mr. Giuliani and Attorney General Barr, to whom the President referred multiple times in tandem.

What Zelensky Actually Said about Hunter and Joe Biden:

President Zelenskyy: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First of all I understand and I’m knowledgeable about the situation. . . He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue. The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case. On top of that, I would kindly ask you if you have any additional information that you can provide to us, it would be very helpful for the investigation to make sure that we administer justice in our country with regard to the Ambassador to the United States from Ukraine as far I as I recall her name was Ivanovich. It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough. . . .

I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation. As to the economy, there is much potential for our two countries and one of the issues that is very important for Ukraine is energy independence. I believe we can be very successful and cooperating on energy independence with United States. We are already working on cooperation.

President Zelensky is asking President Trump for more help and strongly agreeing with Trump that the U.S. Ambassador was acting as a foe of Ukraine. To reiterate–the issue of corruption by Joe Biden and his spawn was already in public and was an issue for Ukraine, not just Trump. Again, not one word about the 2020 election or the Democrat scramble to find a candidate. No threat by Trump to withhold aid. No quid pro quo of any type. Joe Biden is on the record in public demanding Ukraine do what Biden wants or else the U.S. would withhold $1 Billion dollars in aid.

The Whistleblower lied. Not a single mention was made of “locating and turning over DNC servers.” This is a complete fabrication by the so-called Whistleblower.

President Zelensky noted that his people had already spoken with Rudy Giuliani and voiced not one single concern about that. And Zelensky said that his Government would fully cooperate with a U.S. law enforcement investigation.

Worth noting that John Solomon of the Hill is out tonight with documents that expose Joe Biden as a liar in this matter.

The heart of the Whistleblower complaint is a lie. The analyst reported hearsay but, as you can read for yourself, was not what was said on that call.

This is an outrageous abuse by the intelligence community. The CIA cannot and should not be trusted. This analyst is an incompetent who does not know how to distinguish between fact and suspicion.

42Share33TweetEmail
Powered by ZergNet

Celebrities Who Went Missing and Were Never Found

The Real Reason RBG Didn't Retire During Obama's Term

Demi Moore Makes an Eye-Opening Reveal About Jon Cryer

Greta Thunberg Turns Trump's Attack Back on Him

The Untold Truth of Jeff Sessions

Charlize Theron Shares Rare Photo of Her Transgender Daughter

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Join The Gateway Pundit Newsletter
Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Email Address
Subscribe
Join TGP on Facebook

* Facebook censors conservative content. Please like our page on Facebook and please check The Gateway Pundit homepage here for our latest stories. Thank you.

Google discriminates against conservatives. We recommend using Duck Duck Go as your search engine. We support free thought.
Contact The Gateway Pundit
Email Technical Support
Report Issues With Website Performance
Email Comment Support
Send Tips to The Gateway Pundit
Email Jim Hoft
You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

DONATE FOR TRUTH!
Your donations keep theGatewayPundit.com online.
Thank you for your support.

GP Favorite American Blogs
GP Favorite International Blogs
GP Favorite Media
Democracy & Human Rights
Favorite Military & Foreign Service
Favorites From Gateway City & Area
Great Websites
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter
View My Stats
Search The Gateway Pundit
Search

Medical Disclaimer

Monday, September 30, 2019

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Friday, September 27, 2019

Thursday, September 26, 2019